Abstract
Metal additive manufacturing is moving from rapid prototyping to on-demand manufacturing and even to serial production. Consistent part quality and development of a wider range of available materials are key for wider adoption. This requires control and optimization of various laser and scanning parameters. Therefore, process modeling has been extensively pursued to reduce experimental runs in the search for parameters that produce dense, high-quality parts for the given alloy. However, these optimal parameters remain machine-specific if conditions defined by the machine architecture are not considered. Previous studies have shown that shielding gas flow is one such parameter that affects porosity and mechanical properties of parts produced with laser powder bed fusion. However, a lack of consensus remains regarding which phenomena are responsible for the observed decrease in quality. In this study, the effect of shielding gas flow velocity on porosity and melt pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing is studied. It is shown that decreasing the gas flow velocity leads to a drastic loss of penetration of single scan tracks, leading to increased lack-of-fusion porosity at the part level. This is attributed to the obstruction of the laser beam by the process-induced vapor plume emissions of the individual tracks being scanned. As the vapor plume, and how effectively it is removed by the shielding gas flow, have a significant effect on the melt pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion, models aiming at predicting the melt pool geometry and attempts to transfer process parameters from one machine to another should consider the effect of the shielding gas flow.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101030 |
Journal | Additive Manufacturing |
Volume | 32 |
Early online date | 3 Jan 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2020 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Mrs. Seija Kivi for the preparation and imaging of the metallographic specimens. The financial support of VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (grant numbers 118045 and 120438 ) is gratefully acknowledged.
Keywords
- Gas flow
- Melt pool geometry
- Porosity
- Powder bed fusion
- Vapor plume