On the validation of risk analysis

A commentary

Tony Rosqvist (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aven and Heide (2009) [1] provided interesting views on the reliability and validation of risk analysis. The four validation criteria presented are contrasted with modelling features related to the relative frequency—based and Bayesian approaches to risk analysis. In this commentary I would like to bring forth some issues on validation that partly confirm and partly suggest changes in the interpretation of the introduced validation criteria—especially, in the context of low probability–high consequence systems. The mental model of an expert in assessing probabilities is argued to be a key notion in understanding the validation of a risk analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1261-1265
Number of pages5
JournalReliability Engineering and System Safety
Volume95
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Risk analysis

Keywords

  • Risk analysis validation
  • Risk-informed decision-making
  • Uncertainties

Cite this

Rosqvist, Tony. / On the validation of risk analysis : A commentary. In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2010 ; Vol. 95, No. 11. pp. 1261-1265.
@article{58d852867bef4fbb8e63c56aa42c61a1,
title = "On the validation of risk analysis: A commentary",
abstract = "Aven and Heide (2009) [1] provided interesting views on the reliability and validation of risk analysis. The four validation criteria presented are contrasted with modelling features related to the relative frequency—based and Bayesian approaches to risk analysis. In this commentary I would like to bring forth some issues on validation that partly confirm and partly suggest changes in the interpretation of the introduced validation criteria—especially, in the context of low probability–high consequence systems. The mental model of an expert in assessing probabilities is argued to be a key notion in understanding the validation of a risk analysis.",
keywords = "Risk analysis validation, Risk-informed decision-making, Uncertainties",
author = "Tony Rosqvist",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.002",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "1261--1265",
journal = "Reliability Engineering and System Safety",
issn = "0951-8320",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

On the validation of risk analysis : A commentary. / Rosqvist, Tony (Corresponding Author).

In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 95, No. 11, 2010, p. 1261-1265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the validation of risk analysis

T2 - A commentary

AU - Rosqvist, Tony

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Aven and Heide (2009) [1] provided interesting views on the reliability and validation of risk analysis. The four validation criteria presented are contrasted with modelling features related to the relative frequency—based and Bayesian approaches to risk analysis. In this commentary I would like to bring forth some issues on validation that partly confirm and partly suggest changes in the interpretation of the introduced validation criteria—especially, in the context of low probability–high consequence systems. The mental model of an expert in assessing probabilities is argued to be a key notion in understanding the validation of a risk analysis.

AB - Aven and Heide (2009) [1] provided interesting views on the reliability and validation of risk analysis. The four validation criteria presented are contrasted with modelling features related to the relative frequency—based and Bayesian approaches to risk analysis. In this commentary I would like to bring forth some issues on validation that partly confirm and partly suggest changes in the interpretation of the introduced validation criteria—especially, in the context of low probability–high consequence systems. The mental model of an expert in assessing probabilities is argued to be a key notion in understanding the validation of a risk analysis.

KW - Risk analysis validation

KW - Risk-informed decision-making

KW - Uncertainties

U2 - 10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 1261

EP - 1265

JO - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

JF - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

SN - 0951-8320

IS - 11

ER -