Optimising energy flexibility in Finnish residential buildings: A comparative study of PI, rule-based and model predictive control strategies

Rakesh Ramesh*, Hassam Ur Rehman, Ala Hasan, Leena Eerolainen, Hang Yin, Mohamed Hamdy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

As integral components of urban infrastructure, buildings play a crucial role in maintaining occupant well-being, especially during extreme weather conditions. This research presents a model predictive control (MPC) approach to harnessing the energy flexibility of buildings by utilising their thermal mass to cost-effectively manage the energy use. The study compares two apartment buildings located in the Nordic climate of Helsinki, Finland: one built in the 1970s and a modern positive energy building (PEB) with a high-performance envelope exceeding the minimum requirements of national building regulations. Three control strategies are evaluated for building thermal mass activation: Proportional-Integral (PI) control as a standard strategy for thermal comfort, Rule-Based Control (RBC) as a cost-based benchmark strategy and an advanced MPC as an innovative energy-flexible strategy for cost-savings. The three investigated control strategies are implemented by interfacing IDA ICE building energy performance simulation software with the programming environment, Python as a master controller. The study aims to optimise the operation of the building's energy systems in real-time, minimising energy costs while maintaining comfort constraints by adjusting temperature setpoints based on dynamic weather conditions and occupant behaviour by applying the adaptive thermal comfort model. The results, obtained from simulations, demonstrate that the MPC provided the highest cost savings, particularly under high and fluctuating price conditions. In the 1970s building, MPC achieved up to 29.9 % cost savings compared to PI control, while RBC achieved up to 17.2 % savings. In the modern PEB, MPC resulted in up to 14.8 % cost savings, with RBC achieving up to 7.9 % savings. These findings highlight MPC's potential to improve energy efficiency and resilience in buildings, especially in cold climates.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115727
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume338
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2025
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of Finland project “Integration of Building Flexibility into Future Energy Systems 2020-2024” (FlexiB) [Decision number: 333364], the Research Council of Finland project “Energy Resilience in Buildings in Extreme Cold Weather Conditions in Finland 2022–2025” (FinERB) [Decision number: 348060], and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program H2020-LC-EEB-03-2019, “New developments in plus energy houses (IA)” (EXCESS) [Grant number: 870157].

Keywords

  • Cold climate
  • Energy flexibility
  • Model predictive control
  • Positive energy buildings
  • Rule-based control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising energy flexibility in Finnish residential buildings: A comparative study of PI, rule-based and model predictive control strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this