Abstract
This paper reviews recent spectrum sharing models under
study in the spectrum regulation and wireless
communications research domains. An overview of different
spectrum regulator forums and directions is presented and
their activities related to the development of spectrum
sharing models are reviewed. Special emphasis is put on
the recent European and US regulatory approaches for
spectrum sharing. In particular, Licensed Shared Access
(LSA) and Collective Use of Spectrum (CUS) models from
Europe and Three-Tier Hierarchy Model from the US are
analyzed in detail. A comparison is made between these
approaches to identify similarities and differences in
the regulatory developments. Factors for developing a
successful sharing model are also discussed. For a
dynamic spectrum sharing model to be adopted, it must
protect the rights of entrant users without impact to the
legacy systems. It must also create a reasonable
straightforward opportunity for an entity that wishes to
access a shared spectrum to do so in a manner that is
neither overly complex nor costly to implement. The
practical implementation of dynamic spectrum sharing
models is likely to require different national
implementations because the regulatory approaches and the
incumbent spectrum uses are different in various
countries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DYSPAN 2014) |
Publisher | IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers |
Pages | 92-102 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4799-2661-9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | A4 Article in a conference publication |
Event | IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DYSPAN 2014 - McLean, United States Duration: 1 Apr 2014 → 4 Apr 2014 |
Conference
Conference | IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DYSPAN 2014 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | DYSPAN 2014 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | McLean |
Period | 1/04/14 → 4/04/14 |
Keywords
- cognitive radio
- frequency management
- spectrum management
- dynamic spectrum sharing
- licensed shared access