Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Overview of material migration and erosion experiments in the full-tungsten WEST tokamak during Phase 1 and Phase 2 operations

  • Antti Hakola*
  • , M. Diez
  • , N. Fedorczak
  • , J. Gaspar
  • , E. Tsitrone
  • , M. Balden
  • , Y. Corre
  • , S. Di Genova
  • , A. Huart
  • , C. Martin
  • , I. Bogdanovic Radovic
  • , E. Fortuna-Zalesna
  • , E. Grigore
  • , I. Jõgi
  • , M. Kelemen
  • , K. Krieger
  • , A. Lagoyannis
  • , Jari Likonen
  • , S. Markelj
  • , R. Mateus
  • K. Mergia, P. Paris, P. Petersson, Z. Siketic, P. Tsavalas, T. Vuoriheimo, A. Widdowson
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Institut de Recherche sur la Fusion par Confinement Magnétique (IRFM)
  • Institut Universitaire des Systèmes Thermiques Industriels (IUSTI)
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik (IPP)
  • Physique des interactions ioniques et moléculaires (PIIM)
  • Ruđer Bošković Institute (IRB)
  • Warsaw University of Technology
  • National Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR)
  • University of Tartu
  • Jožef Stefan Institute
  • National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos
  • Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear (IPFN)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  • University of Helsinki
  • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper gives an overview of erosion and migration studies of tungsten (W) in the WEST tokamak during its Phase 1 (2016–2021) and Phase 2 (from 2022) experimental campaigns with a focus on plasma-facing components (PFCs) at the divertor. In Phase 1, gross erosion of PFCs is in line with observations from other major fusion devices and attributed to low-Z impurities in the plasma. In addition, a strong asymmetry is observed between the high- (inner) and low-field (outer) side divertor targets, in favour of the inner side. Net erosion at rates of <0.5 nm s−1 is measured around the strike points while the remaining areas are dominated by net deposition. The thickest deposited layers (up to 50 μm) with the most complex structures result from a cumulated plasma exposure of ∼7 h. The overall erosion-deposition pattern is further influenced by the strong magnetic ripple of WEST, which can result in almost an order of magnitude difference between the maxima and minima of the ripple. In Phase 2, increasing plasma fluence leads to the deposits growing to hundreds of micrometres in thickness. At the same time, erosion proceeds at a constant rate and can reach values up to 30 µm in ∼18 h of plasma time. In the main chamber, erosion is weaker than at the divertor but especially at low densities it can result in notable transport of W into the core. In addition, upon switching on the ICRF antennas, W sputtering on the close-by limiter structures can increase by a factor of more than 10. Modelling is able to catch many of the observed phenomena in Phase 1, with the exception of the inner–outer asymmetry and the formation of the thick deposits. In contrast, the patterns during the high-fluence operations in Phase 2 require more work to be reproduced.
Original languageEnglish
Article number086041
JournalNuclear Fusion
Volume66
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2026
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, partially funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200—EUROfusion). The work was partially supported by the Portuguese FCT foundation through project UID/50010/2025.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • deposited layer
  • erosion
  • fluence
  • tungsten
  • WEST

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Overview of material migration and erosion experiments in the full-tungsten WEST tokamak during Phase 1 and Phase 2 operations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this