Patients’ satisfaction and experiences during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey: A qualitative study

Miia Marika Jansson (Corresponding Author), Marja Harjumaa, Ari Pekka Puhto, Minna Pikkarainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To explore how satisfied patients are with the process of treatment and care and to identify the experiences that patients perceive during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey. Background: Greater satisfaction with care has predicted better quality of recovery, and patient experience has been positively associated with patient safety and clinical effectiveness. However, a little is still known about how patients experience their treatment and care. Design: A qualitative interview study. Methods: The study was conducted among 20 patients in a single joint replacement centre during 2018. Patient satisfaction was measured using a numerical rating scale. Patients’ experiences were identified through qualitative semi-structured interviews which were analysed using an inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used (Supporting Information). Results: The mean numerical rating scale score for overall satisfaction was 9.0 (SD 1.1) on a scale from 0–10. The patients’ experiences were grouped under eight main categories that were derived from the qualitative data in the analysis: (a) patient selection, (b) meeting the Health Care Guarantee, (c) patient flow, (d) postdischarge care, (e) patient counselling, (f) transparency of the journey, (g) communication and (h) feedback. Conclusions: The findings suggest that patients are highly satisfied after an elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty. However, closer analysis of the patients’ experiences reveals challenges and suggestions on how they could be solved, often involving digital technologies. Relevance to clinical practice: As the number of total joint arthroplasties grows, patients and their families need to take ever greater responsibility, for their own care from advance preparation to rehabilitation. The findings of the study can be used to organise work, improving patient-clinical communication, fostering engagement and improving patient centredness. In addition, the results pinpoint the issues on how the patient experience could be improved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 26 Nov 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Patient Satisfaction
Hip
Replacement Arthroplasties
Communication
Interviews
Patient Participation
Foster Home Care
Patient Safety
Checklist
Arthroplasty
Patient Selection
Counseling
Patient Care

Keywords

  • care pathways
  • hip replacement
  • knee replacement
  • patient experience
  • qualitative study
  • satisfaction with care

Cite this

@article{b411de1220674e89bf73521a34fd53e7,
title = "Patients’ satisfaction and experiences during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To explore how satisfied patients are with the process of treatment and care and to identify the experiences that patients perceive during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey. Background: Greater satisfaction with care has predicted better quality of recovery, and patient experience has been positively associated with patient safety and clinical effectiveness. However, a little is still known about how patients experience their treatment and care. Design: A qualitative interview study. Methods: The study was conducted among 20 patients in a single joint replacement centre during 2018. Patient satisfaction was measured using a numerical rating scale. Patients’ experiences were identified through qualitative semi-structured interviews which were analysed using an inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used (Supporting Information). Results: The mean numerical rating scale score for overall satisfaction was 9.0 (SD 1.1) on a scale from 0–10. The patients’ experiences were grouped under eight main categories that were derived from the qualitative data in the analysis: (a) patient selection, (b) meeting the Health Care Guarantee, (c) patient flow, (d) postdischarge care, (e) patient counselling, (f) transparency of the journey, (g) communication and (h) feedback. Conclusions: The findings suggest that patients are highly satisfied after an elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty. However, closer analysis of the patients’ experiences reveals challenges and suggestions on how they could be solved, often involving digital technologies. Relevance to clinical practice: As the number of total joint arthroplasties grows, patients and their families need to take ever greater responsibility, for their own care from advance preparation to rehabilitation. The findings of the study can be used to organise work, improving patient-clinical communication, fostering engagement and improving patient centredness. In addition, the results pinpoint the issues on how the patient experience could be improved.",
keywords = "care pathways, hip replacement, knee replacement, patient experience, qualitative study, satisfaction with care",
author = "Jansson, {Miia Marika} and Marja Harjumaa and Puhto, {Ari Pekka} and Minna Pikkarainen",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.15121",
language = "English",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Patients’ satisfaction and experiences during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey : A qualitative study. / Jansson, Miia Marika (Corresponding Author); Harjumaa, Marja; Puhto, Ari Pekka; Pikkarainen, Minna.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26.11.2019, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients’ satisfaction and experiences during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Jansson, Miia Marika

AU - Harjumaa, Marja

AU - Puhto, Ari Pekka

AU - Pikkarainen, Minna

PY - 2019/11/26

Y1 - 2019/11/26

N2 - Aims and objectives: To explore how satisfied patients are with the process of treatment and care and to identify the experiences that patients perceive during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey. Background: Greater satisfaction with care has predicted better quality of recovery, and patient experience has been positively associated with patient safety and clinical effectiveness. However, a little is still known about how patients experience their treatment and care. Design: A qualitative interview study. Methods: The study was conducted among 20 patients in a single joint replacement centre during 2018. Patient satisfaction was measured using a numerical rating scale. Patients’ experiences were identified through qualitative semi-structured interviews which were analysed using an inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used (Supporting Information). Results: The mean numerical rating scale score for overall satisfaction was 9.0 (SD 1.1) on a scale from 0–10. The patients’ experiences were grouped under eight main categories that were derived from the qualitative data in the analysis: (a) patient selection, (b) meeting the Health Care Guarantee, (c) patient flow, (d) postdischarge care, (e) patient counselling, (f) transparency of the journey, (g) communication and (h) feedback. Conclusions: The findings suggest that patients are highly satisfied after an elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty. However, closer analysis of the patients’ experiences reveals challenges and suggestions on how they could be solved, often involving digital technologies. Relevance to clinical practice: As the number of total joint arthroplasties grows, patients and their families need to take ever greater responsibility, for their own care from advance preparation to rehabilitation. The findings of the study can be used to organise work, improving patient-clinical communication, fostering engagement and improving patient centredness. In addition, the results pinpoint the issues on how the patient experience could be improved.

AB - Aims and objectives: To explore how satisfied patients are with the process of treatment and care and to identify the experiences that patients perceive during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey. Background: Greater satisfaction with care has predicted better quality of recovery, and patient experience has been positively associated with patient safety and clinical effectiveness. However, a little is still known about how patients experience their treatment and care. Design: A qualitative interview study. Methods: The study was conducted among 20 patients in a single joint replacement centre during 2018. Patient satisfaction was measured using a numerical rating scale. Patients’ experiences were identified through qualitative semi-structured interviews which were analysed using an inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used (Supporting Information). Results: The mean numerical rating scale score for overall satisfaction was 9.0 (SD 1.1) on a scale from 0–10. The patients’ experiences were grouped under eight main categories that were derived from the qualitative data in the analysis: (a) patient selection, (b) meeting the Health Care Guarantee, (c) patient flow, (d) postdischarge care, (e) patient counselling, (f) transparency of the journey, (g) communication and (h) feedback. Conclusions: The findings suggest that patients are highly satisfied after an elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty. However, closer analysis of the patients’ experiences reveals challenges and suggestions on how they could be solved, often involving digital technologies. Relevance to clinical practice: As the number of total joint arthroplasties grows, patients and their families need to take ever greater responsibility, for their own care from advance preparation to rehabilitation. The findings of the study can be used to organise work, improving patient-clinical communication, fostering engagement and improving patient centredness. In addition, the results pinpoint the issues on how the patient experience could be improved.

KW - care pathways

KW - hip replacement

KW - knee replacement

KW - patient experience

KW - qualitative study

KW - satisfaction with care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076351699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.15121

DO - 10.1111/jocn.15121

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85076351699

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

ER -