Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers

Klaus G. Grunert (Corresponding Author), Liisa Lähteenmäki, Yasemin Boztug, Emilia Martinsdóttir, Øydis Ueland, Annika Åström, Piritta Lampila

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health claim perception was investigated by a web-based instrument with a sample of 4,612 respondents in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden). Respondents decided which of a pair of claims sounded better, was easier to understand and was more convincing in their opinion. Claims were constructed from an underlying universe combining different active ingredients (familiar, unfamiliar), type of claim (combination of information about ingredient, physiological function and health benefit), framing (positive, negative), and use of qualifier (with, without “may”). Across pairs, the claims differed in the health benefit addressed (cardiovascular health, dementia, bodyweight). Results showed that respondents could be grouped into two roughly equally sized classes that differed in the type of claim preferred: one class prefers “long” claims that give the full story consisting of active ingredient, physiological function and health benefit, whereas the other prefers “short” claims consisting of the health benefit only. Results also showed that the familiar ingredient is preferred to the unfamiliar one, whereas effects of positive versus negative framing depended on the type of health benefit addressed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-287
JournalJournal of Consumer Policy
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Health benefits
Health claims
Nordic
Finland
Denmark
Nordic countries
Iceland
Health
Sweden
Web-based
Body weight
Norway
Dementia

Keywords

  • Health claims
  • healthy eating
  • marketing
  • food

Cite this

Grunert, K. G., Lähteenmäki, L., Boztug, Y., Martinsdóttir, E., Ueland, Ø., Åström, A., & Lampila, P. (2009). Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9110-0
Grunert, Klaus G. ; Lähteenmäki, Liisa ; Boztug, Yasemin ; Martinsdóttir, Emilia ; Ueland, Øydis ; Åström, Annika ; Lampila, Piritta. / Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers. In: Journal of Consumer Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 269-287.
@article{1e1c99c9791b487898896118f2f87cdf,
title = "Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers",
abstract = "Health claim perception was investigated by a web-based instrument with a sample of 4,612 respondents in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden). Respondents decided which of a pair of claims sounded better, was easier to understand and was more convincing in their opinion. Claims were constructed from an underlying universe combining different active ingredients (familiar, unfamiliar), type of claim (combination of information about ingredient, physiological function and health benefit), framing (positive, negative), and use of qualifier (with, without “may”). Across pairs, the claims differed in the health benefit addressed (cardiovascular health, dementia, bodyweight). Results showed that respondents could be grouped into two roughly equally sized classes that differed in the type of claim preferred: one class prefers “long” claims that give the full story consisting of active ingredient, physiological function and health benefit, whereas the other prefers “short” claims consisting of the health benefit only. Results also showed that the familiar ingredient is preferred to the unfamiliar one, whereas effects of positive versus negative framing depended on the type of health benefit addressed.",
keywords = "Health claims, healthy eating, marketing, food",
author = "Grunert, {Klaus G.} and Liisa L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki and Yasemin Boztug and Emilia Martinsd{\'o}ttir and {\O}ydis Ueland and Annika {\AA}str{\"o}m and Piritta Lampila",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s10603-009-9110-0",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "269--287",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Policy",
issn = "0168-7034",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "3",

}

Grunert, KG, Lähteenmäki, L, Boztug, Y, Martinsdóttir, E, Ueland, Ø, Åström, A & Lampila, P 2009, 'Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers', Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9110-0

Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers. / Grunert, Klaus G. (Corresponding Author); Lähteenmäki, Liisa; Boztug, Yasemin; Martinsdóttir, Emilia; Ueland, Øydis; Åström, Annika; Lampila, Piritta.

In: Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2009, p. 269-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers

AU - Grunert, Klaus G.

AU - Lähteenmäki, Liisa

AU - Boztug, Yasemin

AU - Martinsdóttir, Emilia

AU - Ueland, Øydis

AU - Åström, Annika

AU - Lampila, Piritta

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Health claim perception was investigated by a web-based instrument with a sample of 4,612 respondents in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden). Respondents decided which of a pair of claims sounded better, was easier to understand and was more convincing in their opinion. Claims were constructed from an underlying universe combining different active ingredients (familiar, unfamiliar), type of claim (combination of information about ingredient, physiological function and health benefit), framing (positive, negative), and use of qualifier (with, without “may”). Across pairs, the claims differed in the health benefit addressed (cardiovascular health, dementia, bodyweight). Results showed that respondents could be grouped into two roughly equally sized classes that differed in the type of claim preferred: one class prefers “long” claims that give the full story consisting of active ingredient, physiological function and health benefit, whereas the other prefers “short” claims consisting of the health benefit only. Results also showed that the familiar ingredient is preferred to the unfamiliar one, whereas effects of positive versus negative framing depended on the type of health benefit addressed.

AB - Health claim perception was investigated by a web-based instrument with a sample of 4,612 respondents in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden). Respondents decided which of a pair of claims sounded better, was easier to understand and was more convincing in their opinion. Claims were constructed from an underlying universe combining different active ingredients (familiar, unfamiliar), type of claim (combination of information about ingredient, physiological function and health benefit), framing (positive, negative), and use of qualifier (with, without “may”). Across pairs, the claims differed in the health benefit addressed (cardiovascular health, dementia, bodyweight). Results showed that respondents could be grouped into two roughly equally sized classes that differed in the type of claim preferred: one class prefers “long” claims that give the full story consisting of active ingredient, physiological function and health benefit, whereas the other prefers “short” claims consisting of the health benefit only. Results also showed that the familiar ingredient is preferred to the unfamiliar one, whereas effects of positive versus negative framing depended on the type of health benefit addressed.

KW - Health claims

KW - healthy eating

KW - marketing

KW - food

U2 - 10.1007/s10603-009-9110-0

DO - 10.1007/s10603-009-9110-0

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 269

EP - 287

JO - Journal of Consumer Policy

JF - Journal of Consumer Policy

SN - 0168-7034

IS - 3

ER -

Grunert KG, Lähteenmäki L, Boztug Y, Martinsdóttir E, Ueland Ø, Åström A et al. Perception of health claims among Nordic consumers. Journal of Consumer Policy. 2009;32(3):269-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9110-0