Abstract
In mineral processing, optimal operation and process control are essential. Accurate forecasting models are needed, and while data-driven models for multistep forecasting have shown promise, the potential for incorporating physics-based information to enhance accuracy was investigated in this paper. The objective was to determine accuracy improvement by adding physics information to the baseline data-driven models. Three purely data-driven multivariate multistep forecasting models (CNN, GRU, LSTM) from previous research were selected and their architectures recreated for comparison. Pre-processing and feature engineering methods were harmonised to form baseline models, which were validated on the same physical flotation process. Physics information was added using two different physics-guided loss functions that utilised mass balance, resulting in surrogate models based on multivariate multistep forecasting and physics-informed machine learning (PIML). These models were trained and tested on the same dataset to compare performance with baseline models and among different algorithms. Key findings indicated that all the PIML models outperformed their data-driven counterparts. The largest improvements in the NRMSE and NMAE were observed in the LSTM models, while the CNN models showed the lowest improvement. Error distributions across the forecasting horizons improved for all the models, and a loss function utilising a mean absolute error performed better than a mean-squared error across all models. In conclusion, incorporating physics information into multivariate multistep forecasting surrogates generally enhanced forecasting accuracy. However, the extent of improvement varied, and the decision to integrate physics should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the need for domain knowledge and the increased time and resource requirements for PIML model development.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 109424 |
Journal | Minerals Engineering |
Volume | 230 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2025 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
The work was funded by Business Finland and VTT. The authors also wish to thank CSC \u2013 IT Center for Science , Finland, for the computational resources provided. All the opinions and findings in this work are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of sponsors or collaborators.
Keywords
- Gold flotation
- Mineral processing
- Multivariate multistep forecasting
- Physics-informed machine learning
- Surrogate modelling