### Abstract

Original language | English |
---|---|

Article number | A20 |

Number of pages | 20 |

Journal | Astronomy and Astrophysics |

Volume | 571 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 2014 |

MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |

### Fingerprint

### Keywords

- cosmological parameters
- galaxies
- universe

### Cite this

*Astronomy and Astrophysics*,

*571*, [A20]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321521

}

*Astronomy and Astrophysics*, vol. 571, A20. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321521

**Planck 2013 results : XX. Cosmology from Synyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts.** / Tuovinen, Jussi; Planck Collaboration.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planck 2013 results

T2 - XX. Cosmology from Synyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts

AU - Tuovinen, Jussi

AU - Planck Collaboration

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We present constraints on cosmological parameters using number counts as a function of redshift for a sub-sample of 189 galaxy clusters from the Planck SZ (PSZ) catalogue. The PSZ is selected through the signature of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect, and the sub-sample used here has a signal-to-noise threshold of seven, with each object confirmed as a cluster and all but one with a redshift estimate. We discuss the completeness of the sample and our construction of a likelihood analysis. Using a relation between mass M and SZ signal Y calibrated to X-ray measurements, we derive constraints on the power spectrum amplitude s8 and matter density parameter Om in a flat ?CDM model. We test the robustness of our estimates and find that possible biases in the Y-M relation and the halo mass function are larger than the statistical uncertainties from the cluster sample. Assuming the X-ray determined mass to be biased low relative to the true mass by between zero and 30%, motivated by comparison of the observed mass scaling relations to those from a set of numerical simulations, we find that s8 = 0.75 ± 0.03, Om = 0.29 ± 0.02, and s8(Om/0.27)0.3 = 0.764 ± 0.025. The value of s8 is degenerate with the mass bias; if the latter is fixed to a value of 20% (the central value from numerical simulations) we find s8(Om/0.27)0.3 = 0.78 ± 0.01 and a tighter one-dimensional range s8 = 0.77 ± 0.02. We find that the larger values of s8 and Om preferred by Planck's measurements of the primary CMB anisotropies can be accommodated by a mass bias of about 40%. Alternatively, consistency with the primary CMB constraints can be achieved by inclusion of processes that suppress power on small scales relative to the ?CDM model, such as a component of massive neutrinos. We place our results in the context of other determinations of cosmological parameters, and discuss issues that need to be resolved in order to make further progress in this field.

AB - We present constraints on cosmological parameters using number counts as a function of redshift for a sub-sample of 189 galaxy clusters from the Planck SZ (PSZ) catalogue. The PSZ is selected through the signature of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect, and the sub-sample used here has a signal-to-noise threshold of seven, with each object confirmed as a cluster and all but one with a redshift estimate. We discuss the completeness of the sample and our construction of a likelihood analysis. Using a relation between mass M and SZ signal Y calibrated to X-ray measurements, we derive constraints on the power spectrum amplitude s8 and matter density parameter Om in a flat ?CDM model. We test the robustness of our estimates and find that possible biases in the Y-M relation and the halo mass function are larger than the statistical uncertainties from the cluster sample. Assuming the X-ray determined mass to be biased low relative to the true mass by between zero and 30%, motivated by comparison of the observed mass scaling relations to those from a set of numerical simulations, we find that s8 = 0.75 ± 0.03, Om = 0.29 ± 0.02, and s8(Om/0.27)0.3 = 0.764 ± 0.025. The value of s8 is degenerate with the mass bias; if the latter is fixed to a value of 20% (the central value from numerical simulations) we find s8(Om/0.27)0.3 = 0.78 ± 0.01 and a tighter one-dimensional range s8 = 0.77 ± 0.02. We find that the larger values of s8 and Om preferred by Planck's measurements of the primary CMB anisotropies can be accommodated by a mass bias of about 40%. Alternatively, consistency with the primary CMB constraints can be achieved by inclusion of processes that suppress power on small scales relative to the ?CDM model, such as a component of massive neutrinos. We place our results in the context of other determinations of cosmological parameters, and discuss issues that need to be resolved in order to make further progress in this field.

KW - cosmological parameters

KW - galaxies

KW - universe

U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/201321521

DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/201321521

M3 - Article

VL - 571

JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics

JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics

SN - 0004-6361

M1 - A20

ER -