TY - JOUR
T1 - Positive affect state is a good predictor of movement and stress
T2 - Combining data from ESM/EMA, mobile HRV measurements and trait questionnaires
AU - Määttänen, Ilmari
AU - Henttonen, Pentti
AU - Väliaho, Julius
AU - Palomäki, Jussi
AU - Thibault, Maisa
AU - Kallio, Johanna
AU - Mäntyjärvi, Jani
AU - Harviainen, Tatu
AU - Jokela, Markus
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Tekes (now Business Finland; project 2962/31/2013 ), Finland. IM was supported by Academy of Finland (project 311578 ), Finland.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2/25
Y1 - 2021/2/25
N2 - Personality describes the average behaviour and responses of individuals across situations; but personality traits are often poor predictors of behaviour in specific situations. This is known as the “personality paradox”. We evaluated the interrelations between various trait and state variables in participants’ everyday lives. As state measures, we used 1) experience sampling methodology (ESM/EMA) to measure perceived affect, stress, and presence of social company; and 2) heart rate variability and 3) real-time movement (accelerometer data) to indicate physiological stress and physical movement. These data were linked with self-report measures of personality and personality-like traits. Trait variables predicted affect states and multiple associations were found: traits neuroticism and rumination decreased positive affect state and increased negative affect state. Positive affect state, in turn, was the strongest predictor of observed movement. Positive affect was also associated with heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV). Negative affect, in turn, was not associated with neither movement, HR or HRV. The study provides evidence on the influence of personality-like traits and social context to affect states, and, in turn, their influence to movement and stress variables.
AB - Personality describes the average behaviour and responses of individuals across situations; but personality traits are often poor predictors of behaviour in specific situations. This is known as the “personality paradox”. We evaluated the interrelations between various trait and state variables in participants’ everyday lives. As state measures, we used 1) experience sampling methodology (ESM/EMA) to measure perceived affect, stress, and presence of social company; and 2) heart rate variability and 3) real-time movement (accelerometer data) to indicate physiological stress and physical movement. These data were linked with self-report measures of personality and personality-like traits. Trait variables predicted affect states and multiple associations were found: traits neuroticism and rumination decreased positive affect state and increased negative affect state. Positive affect state, in turn, was the strongest predictor of observed movement. Positive affect was also associated with heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV). Negative affect, in turn, was not associated with neither movement, HR or HRV. The study provides evidence on the influence of personality-like traits and social context to affect states, and, in turn, their influence to movement and stress variables.
KW - Affect
KW - EMA
KW - ESM
KW - Heart rate variability
KW - Movement
KW - Personality
KW - Self assessment
KW - Stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101508728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06243
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06243
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101508728
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 7
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 2
M1 - e06243
ER -