Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill: Part II: Economic feasibility

Eemeli Tsupari (Corresponding Author), Janne Kärki, Antti Arasto, Erkki Pisilä

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper the economics of the technical possibilities presented in Part I (Arasto et al., 2013) for applying post-combustion CO2 capture at an integrated steel mill were studied. Implications of different CO2 amounts captured, solvents and process integration levels to the greenhouse gas balances and economics of operation are compared to the reference case without CCS trough several case studies using variable market prices of electricity and CO2 emission allowances. The break-even price (BEP) of CO2 emissions (e.g. CO2 emission allowances), where CCS becomes more profitable than the reference case, is about 72€/t CO2 with an electricity price of 100€/MWh in the most favourable studied case using a MEA solvent. For the more advanced solvents considered, the BEP level is about 64€/t CO2. With higher prices of electricity, the costs for CCS increase rapidly. The costs for globally avoided emissions, based on a streamlined life-cycle analysis, are generally higher than the BEP's, depending on the fuels that are assumed to eventually compensate the decreased electricity production in the energy system. The amounts of captured CO2 corresponding to the above presented prices in the most favourable cases are typically in the range of 2-3Mt CO2/a, which accounts for 50-75% of the site emissions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-286
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Iron and steel plants
mill
Electricity
combustion
steel
electricity
Economics
economics
life cycle analysis
Greenhouse gases
Costs
Life cycle
cost
trough
greenhouse gas
price
energy

Keywords

  • CCS
  • Cost
  • Feasibility
  • Iron and steel industry
  • Post-combustion capture

Cite this

@article{8ce015fa74e5428d9a41ac605b648838,
title = "Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill: Part II: Economic feasibility",
abstract = "In this paper the economics of the technical possibilities presented in Part I (Arasto et al., 2013) for applying post-combustion CO2 capture at an integrated steel mill were studied. Implications of different CO2 amounts captured, solvents and process integration levels to the greenhouse gas balances and economics of operation are compared to the reference case without CCS trough several case studies using variable market prices of electricity and CO2 emission allowances. The break-even price (BEP) of CO2 emissions (e.g. CO2 emission allowances), where CCS becomes more profitable than the reference case, is about 72€/t CO2 with an electricity price of 100€/MWh in the most favourable studied case using a MEA solvent. For the more advanced solvents considered, the BEP level is about 64€/t CO2. With higher prices of electricity, the costs for CCS increase rapidly. The costs for globally avoided emissions, based on a streamlined life-cycle analysis, are generally higher than the BEP's, depending on the fuels that are assumed to eventually compensate the decreased electricity production in the energy system. The amounts of captured CO2 corresponding to the above presented prices in the most favourable cases are typically in the range of 2-3Mt CO2/a, which accounts for 50-75{\%} of the site emissions.",
keywords = "CCS, Cost, Feasibility, Iron and steel industry, Post-combustion capture",
author = "Eemeli Tsupari and Janne K{\"a}rki and Antti Arasto and Erkki Pisil{\"a}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.017",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "278--286",
journal = "International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control",
issn = "1750-5836",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill : Part II: Economic feasibility. / Tsupari, Eemeli (Corresponding Author); Kärki, Janne; Arasto, Antti; Pisilä, Erkki.

In: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 16, 01.08.2013, p. 278-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill

T2 - Part II: Economic feasibility

AU - Tsupari, Eemeli

AU - Kärki, Janne

AU - Arasto, Antti

AU - Pisilä, Erkki

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - In this paper the economics of the technical possibilities presented in Part I (Arasto et al., 2013) for applying post-combustion CO2 capture at an integrated steel mill were studied. Implications of different CO2 amounts captured, solvents and process integration levels to the greenhouse gas balances and economics of operation are compared to the reference case without CCS trough several case studies using variable market prices of electricity and CO2 emission allowances. The break-even price (BEP) of CO2 emissions (e.g. CO2 emission allowances), where CCS becomes more profitable than the reference case, is about 72€/t CO2 with an electricity price of 100€/MWh in the most favourable studied case using a MEA solvent. For the more advanced solvents considered, the BEP level is about 64€/t CO2. With higher prices of electricity, the costs for CCS increase rapidly. The costs for globally avoided emissions, based on a streamlined life-cycle analysis, are generally higher than the BEP's, depending on the fuels that are assumed to eventually compensate the decreased electricity production in the energy system. The amounts of captured CO2 corresponding to the above presented prices in the most favourable cases are typically in the range of 2-3Mt CO2/a, which accounts for 50-75% of the site emissions.

AB - In this paper the economics of the technical possibilities presented in Part I (Arasto et al., 2013) for applying post-combustion CO2 capture at an integrated steel mill were studied. Implications of different CO2 amounts captured, solvents and process integration levels to the greenhouse gas balances and economics of operation are compared to the reference case without CCS trough several case studies using variable market prices of electricity and CO2 emission allowances. The break-even price (BEP) of CO2 emissions (e.g. CO2 emission allowances), where CCS becomes more profitable than the reference case, is about 72€/t CO2 with an electricity price of 100€/MWh in the most favourable studied case using a MEA solvent. For the more advanced solvents considered, the BEP level is about 64€/t CO2. With higher prices of electricity, the costs for CCS increase rapidly. The costs for globally avoided emissions, based on a streamlined life-cycle analysis, are generally higher than the BEP's, depending on the fuels that are assumed to eventually compensate the decreased electricity production in the energy system. The amounts of captured CO2 corresponding to the above presented prices in the most favourable cases are typically in the range of 2-3Mt CO2/a, which accounts for 50-75% of the site emissions.

KW - CCS

KW - Cost

KW - Feasibility

KW - Iron and steel industry

KW - Post-combustion capture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878250691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878250691

VL - 16

SP - 278

EP - 286

JO - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

JF - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

SN - 1750-5836

ER -