Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions

Marcus Laaksoharju; Petteri Pitkänen; Jan-Olof Selroos; Mia Mäntynen

Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions

Marcus Laaksoharju
, Petteri Pitkänen
, Jan-Olof Selroos
, Mia Mäntynen

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

GeoPoint AB
VTT (former employee or external)
Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management (SKB)
Posiva Oy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

One of the main objectives of the Site Descriptive Models used by SKB (The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company) in Sweden and POSIVA in Finland is to describe the chemistry and distribution of the groundwater in the bedrock and overburden and the processes involved in its origin and evolution. Through various cooperation projects the two companies have created models and understanding of the geohistory and the effects on the current groundwater features, conditions and possible future evolution but also an understanding of the limits of such modelling approaches.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case
Subtitle of host publication	Second AMIGO Workshop Proceedings
Place of Publication	Paris
Publisher	OECD
Pages	99-103
ISBN (Print)	978-92-64-01966-9
Publication status	Published - 2007
MoE publication type	A4 Article in a conference publication
Event	2nd AMIGO Workshop - Toronto, Canada Duration: 20 Sept 2005 → 22 Sept 2005

Conference

Conference	2nd AMIGO Workshop
Country/Territory	Canada
City	Toronto
Period	20/09/05 → 22/09/05

Keywords

hydrogeochemistry
palaeohydrogeology
integration
flow model

Access to Document

https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2007/07/linkage-of-geoscientific-arguments-and-evidence-in-supporting-the-safety-case_g1gh80a7/9789264021747-en.pdf#page=99

Cite this

Laaksoharju, M., Pitkänen, P., Selroos, J.-O., & Mäntynen, M. (2007). Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions. In Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case: Second AMIGO Workshop Proceedings (pp. 99-103). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2007/07/linkage-of-geoscientific-arguments-and-evidence-in-supporting-the-safety-case_g1gh80a7/9789264021747-en.pdf#page=99

@inproceedings{400040e988424791a0b5d49c43def496,

title = "Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions",

abstract = "One of the main objectives of the Site Descriptive Models used by SKB (The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company) in Sweden and POSIVA in Finland is to describe the chemistry and distribution of the groundwater in the bedrock and overburden and the processes involved in its origin and evolution. Through various cooperation projects the two companies have created models and understanding of the geohistory and the effects on the current groundwater features, conditions and possible future evolution but also an understanding of the limits of such modelling approaches.",

keywords = "hydrogeochemistry, palaeohydrogeology, integration, flow model",

author = "Marcus Laaksoharju and Petteri Pitk{\"a}nen and Jan-Olof Selroos and Mia M{\"a}ntynen",

year = "2007",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-92-64-01966-9",

pages = "99--103",

booktitle = "Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case",

publisher = "OECD",

address = "France",

note = "2nd AMIGO Workshop ; Conference date: 20-09-2005 Through 22-09-2005",

}

Laaksoharju, M, Pitkänen, P, Selroos, J-O & Mäntynen, M 2007, Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions. in Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case: Second AMIGO Workshop Proceedings. OECD, Paris, pp. 99-103, 2nd AMIGO Workshop, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 20/09/05. <https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2007/07/linkage-of-geoscientific-arguments-and-evidence-in-supporting-the-safety-case_g1gh80a7/9789264021747-en.pdf#page=99>

Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions. / Laaksoharju, Marcus; Pitkänen, Petteri; Selroos, Jan-Olof et al.
Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case: Second AMIGO Workshop Proceedings. Paris: OECD, 2007. p. 99-103.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions

AU - Laaksoharju, Marcus

AU - Pitkänen, Petteri

AU - Selroos, Jan-Olof

AU - Mäntynen, Mia

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - One of the main objectives of the Site Descriptive Models used by SKB (The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company) in Sweden and POSIVA in Finland is to describe the chemistry and distribution of the groundwater in the bedrock and overburden and the processes involved in its origin and evolution. Through various cooperation projects the two companies have created models and understanding of the geohistory and the effects on the current groundwater features, conditions and possible future evolution but also an understanding of the limits of such modelling approaches.

AB - One of the main objectives of the Site Descriptive Models used by SKB (The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company) in Sweden and POSIVA in Finland is to describe the chemistry and distribution of the groundwater in the bedrock and overburden and the processes involved in its origin and evolution. Through various cooperation projects the two companies have created models and understanding of the geohistory and the effects on the current groundwater features, conditions and possible future evolution but also an understanding of the limits of such modelling approaches.

KW - hydrogeochemistry

KW - palaeohydrogeology

KW - integration

KW - flow model

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-92-64-01966-9

SP - 99

EP - 103

BT - Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case

PB - OECD

CY - Paris

T2 - 2nd AMIGO Workshop

Y2 - 20 September 2005 through 22 September 2005

ER -

Potentials and limitations of the use of geohistory for the understanding of current features and conditions and possible future evolutions

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this