Abstract
The present study focuses on the ability of several computer models to
accurately predict the solidification, microsegregation and pitting corrosion
resistance of austenitic stainless steel weld metals.Emphasis was given to
modelling the effect of welding speed on solute redistribution and ultimately
to the prediction of weld pitting corrosion resistance.Calculations were
experimentally verified by applying autogenous GTA- and laser processes over
the welding speed range of 0.1 to 5 m/min for several austenitic stainless
steel grades.Analytical and computer aided models were applied and linked
together for modelling the solidification behaviour of welds.The combined use
of macroscopic and microscopic modelling is a unique feature of this work.This
procedure made it possible to demonstrate the effect of weld pool shape and
the resulting solidification parameters on microsegregation and pitting
corrosion resistance.Microscopic models were also used separately to study the
role of welding speed and solidification mode in the development of
microsegregation and pitting corrosion resistance.These investigations
demonstrate that the macroscopic model can be implemented to predict
solidification parameters that agree well with experimentally measured values.
The linked macro-micro modelling was also able to accurately predict
segregation profiles and CPT-temperatures obtained from experiments.The
macro-micro simulations clearly showed the major roles of weld composition and
welding speed in determining segregation and pitting corrosion resistance
while the effect of weld shape variations remained negligible.The microscopic
dendrite tip and interdendritic models were applied to welds with good
agreement with measured segregation profiles.Simulations predicted that weld
inhomogeneity can be substantially decreased with increasing welding speed
resulting in a corresponding improvement in the weld pitting corrosion
resistance.In the case of primary austenitic solidification, the dendrite
cores were predicted to be the weakest link with respect to weld pitting
corrosion resistance.In primary ferritic solidification, the second phase
austenite in the vicinity of d/g interfaces was predicted to show lowest
pitting corrosion resistance.Solidification parameters used in the modelling
were verified by cooling rate and dendrite arm spacing measurements as well as
by analytical calculations.Experimental investigations using electron probe
microanalyses (EPMA, CMA), electron microscopy (SEM, FEG-STEM),
microstructural investigations and pitting corrosion tests were used in
assessing the calculated microsegregation and CPT-temperatures and showed a
reasonably good compatibility with the results of modelling.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor Degree |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Award date | 22 Jun 1999 |
| Place of Publication | Espoo |
| Publisher | |
| Print ISBNs | 951-38-5383-7 |
| Electronic ISBNs | 951-38-5384-5 |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
| MoE publication type | G4 Doctoral dissertation (monograph) |
Keywords
- austenitic stainless steels
- welding
- surface remelting
- solidification
- microsegregation
- corrosion resistance
- modelling
- prediction
- pitting corrosion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of microsegregation and pitting corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steel welds by modelling: Dissertation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 3 Citations
- 1 Article
-
Prediction of microsegregation and pitting corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steel welds by modelling
Vilpas, M., 2001, In: Welding in the World. 45, 3-4, p. 3-11Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver