Abstract
There is a growing interest to find ways and methods to
finance capital investments in infrastructure by
deploying private capital. Entering private capital into
transport infrastructure planning, construction, and
maintenance markets requires that the investors'
behaviour and motives are understood. Private sector
financing of infrastructure and other larger-scale
investments have increasingly taken the form of project
finance. The project cash flows are divided by equity
investors, debt investors, contractors and suppliers and
the users that receive the service.
This research investigates the characteristics of a
feasible framework for private finance of road
infrastructure projects using one case project as an id,
which is analysed in depth. The research makes an effort
to find out whether private finance of road
infrastructure projects is able to bring additional
benefits for the state and the project investors and
whether private finance is applicable from the viewpoint
of the aforementioned.
The concept of risk is presented in the framework of
financial theory. The relevant project cash flows are
identified, as their volatility builds the risks of the
project. The project cash flows are studied in detail as
to how they form the value of the project. One essential
outcome is the project model. The empirical model is
built in view of the decision making point on case
project in 1996, when the bidding for the project was
officially initiated. Recent observed, real data is used
to validate the project model. The sub-models of the
project model include the cash flow model and the risk
structure model, the former based on financial theory and
Capital Asset Pricing Model, the latter based on the cash
flow model and literature on risk. Simulation is used as
the primary method of analysis.
The primary source of time series data for economic
variables, traffic volumes and road operating and
construction is the Finnish Road Administration's
production statistics.
The case project finance is evaluated from multiple
angles - what type of projects and what type of investors
seem to be appropriate for shadow toll finance. Also some
policy recommendations are provided. The private
investors can gain by financing infrastructure projects,
but it comes with a price, which is always paid by the
taxpayers or users. To justify private finance, the
beneficial aspects of private capital deployment must be
substantial. The projects must be the best projects from
a socio-economic viewpoint and not the ones that do not
survive the competition in the normal budgetary process.
Different risk factors are behind the long-term value
risk and short-term insolvency risk of the project
company. Project-specific risk factors are at least as
important as economy level factors.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor Degree |
Awarding Institution |
|
Award date | 2 Mar 2007 |
Place of Publication | Espoo |
Publisher | |
Print ISBNs | 978-951-38-6880-2 |
Electronic ISBNs | 978-951-38-6881-9 |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |
MoE publication type | G4 Doctoral dissertation (monograph) |
Keywords
- private finance
- transport infrastructure projects
- private capital
- project risks
- project model
- cash flow model
- risk structure model
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)