Proactive Environmental Systems: The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring

M. Rönkkö, Ville Kotovirta, K. Karatzas, L. Bastin, M. Stocker, M. Kolehmainen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this article we envision factors and trends that shape the next generation of environmental monitoring systems. One key factor in this respect is the combined effect of end-user needs and the general development of IT services and their availability. Currently, an environmental (monitoring) system is assumed to be reactive. It delivers measurement data and computational results only if the user explicitly asks for it either by query or subscription. There is a temptation to automate this by simply pushing data to end-users. This, however, leads easily to an “advertisement strategy”, where data is pushed to end-users regardless of users’ needs. Under this strategy, the mere amount of received data obfuscates the individual messages; any “automatic” service, regardless of its fitness, overruns a system that requires the user’s initiative. The foreseeable problem is that, unless there is no overall management, each new environmental service is going to compete for end-users’ attention and, thus, inadvertently hinder the use of existing services. As the main contribution we investigate the nature of proactive environmental systems, and how they should be designed to avoid the aforementioned problem. We also discuss how semantics, participatory sensing, uncertainty management, and situational awareness link to proactive environmental systems. We illustrate our proposals with some real-life examples
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationiEMSs 2012 Proceedings
    EditorsR. Seppelt, A.A. Voinov, S. Lange, D. Bankamp
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
    Event6th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, iEMSs 2012 - Leipzig, Germany
    Duration: 1 Jul 20125 Jul 2012

    Conference

    Conference6th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, iEMSs 2012
    Abbreviated titleiEMSs 2012
    CountryGermany
    CityLeipzig
    Period1/07/125/07/12

    Fingerprint

    Monitoring
    Semantics
    Availability
    Uncertainty

    Keywords

    • Environmental monitoring
    • Participatory sensing
    • Uncertainty management
    • Software agents

    Cite this

    Rönkkö, M., Kotovirta, V., Karatzas, K., Bastin, L., Stocker, M., & Kolehmainen, M. (2012). Proactive Environmental Systems: The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring. In R. Seppelt, A. A. Voinov, S. Lange, & D. Bankamp (Eds.), iEMSs 2012 Proceedings [8]
    Rönkkö, M. ; Kotovirta, Ville ; Karatzas, K. ; Bastin, L. ; Stocker, M. ; Kolehmainen, M. / Proactive Environmental Systems : The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring. iEMSs 2012 Proceedings. editor / R. Seppelt ; A.A. Voinov ; S. Lange ; D. Bankamp. 2012.
    @inproceedings{634fd98aae314483aabddb4b088933b7,
    title = "Proactive Environmental Systems: The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring",
    abstract = "In this article we envision factors and trends that shape the next generation of environmental monitoring systems. One key factor in this respect is the combined effect of end-user needs and the general development of IT services and their availability. Currently, an environmental (monitoring) system is assumed to be reactive. It delivers measurement data and computational results only if the user explicitly asks for it either by query or subscription. There is a temptation to automate this by simply pushing data to end-users. This, however, leads easily to an “advertisement strategy”, where data is pushed to end-users regardless of users’ needs. Under this strategy, the mere amount of received data obfuscates the individual messages; any “automatic” service, regardless of its fitness, overruns a system that requires the user’s initiative. The foreseeable problem is that, unless there is no overall management, each new environmental service is going to compete for end-users’ attention and, thus, inadvertently hinder the use of existing services. As the main contribution we investigate the nature of proactive environmental systems, and how they should be designed to avoid the aforementioned problem. We also discuss how semantics, participatory sensing, uncertainty management, and situational awareness link to proactive environmental systems. We illustrate our proposals with some real-life examples",
    keywords = "Environmental monitoring, Participatory sensing, Uncertainty management, Software agents",
    author = "M. R{\"o}nkk{\"o} and Ville Kotovirta and K. Karatzas and L. Bastin and M. Stocker and M. Kolehmainen",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-88-9035-742-8",
    editor = "R. Seppelt and A.A. Voinov and S. Lange and D. Bankamp",
    booktitle = "iEMSs 2012 Proceedings",

    }

    Rönkkö, M, Kotovirta, V, Karatzas, K, Bastin, L, Stocker, M & Kolehmainen, M 2012, Proactive Environmental Systems: The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring. in R Seppelt, AA Voinov, S Lange & D Bankamp (eds), iEMSs 2012 Proceedings., 8, 6th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, iEMSs 2012, Leipzig, Germany, 1/07/12.

    Proactive Environmental Systems : The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring. / Rönkkö, M.; Kotovirta, Ville; Karatzas, K.; Bastin, L.; Stocker, M.; Kolehmainen, M.

    iEMSs 2012 Proceedings. ed. / R. Seppelt; A.A. Voinov; S. Lange; D. Bankamp. 2012. 8.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Proactive Environmental Systems

    T2 - The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring

    AU - Rönkkö, M.

    AU - Kotovirta, Ville

    AU - Karatzas, K.

    AU - Bastin, L.

    AU - Stocker, M.

    AU - Kolehmainen, M.

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - In this article we envision factors and trends that shape the next generation of environmental monitoring systems. One key factor in this respect is the combined effect of end-user needs and the general development of IT services and their availability. Currently, an environmental (monitoring) system is assumed to be reactive. It delivers measurement data and computational results only if the user explicitly asks for it either by query or subscription. There is a temptation to automate this by simply pushing data to end-users. This, however, leads easily to an “advertisement strategy”, where data is pushed to end-users regardless of users’ needs. Under this strategy, the mere amount of received data obfuscates the individual messages; any “automatic” service, regardless of its fitness, overruns a system that requires the user’s initiative. The foreseeable problem is that, unless there is no overall management, each new environmental service is going to compete for end-users’ attention and, thus, inadvertently hinder the use of existing services. As the main contribution we investigate the nature of proactive environmental systems, and how they should be designed to avoid the aforementioned problem. We also discuss how semantics, participatory sensing, uncertainty management, and situational awareness link to proactive environmental systems. We illustrate our proposals with some real-life examples

    AB - In this article we envision factors and trends that shape the next generation of environmental monitoring systems. One key factor in this respect is the combined effect of end-user needs and the general development of IT services and their availability. Currently, an environmental (monitoring) system is assumed to be reactive. It delivers measurement data and computational results only if the user explicitly asks for it either by query or subscription. There is a temptation to automate this by simply pushing data to end-users. This, however, leads easily to an “advertisement strategy”, where data is pushed to end-users regardless of users’ needs. Under this strategy, the mere amount of received data obfuscates the individual messages; any “automatic” service, regardless of its fitness, overruns a system that requires the user’s initiative. The foreseeable problem is that, unless there is no overall management, each new environmental service is going to compete for end-users’ attention and, thus, inadvertently hinder the use of existing services. As the main contribution we investigate the nature of proactive environmental systems, and how they should be designed to avoid the aforementioned problem. We also discuss how semantics, participatory sensing, uncertainty management, and situational awareness link to proactive environmental systems. We illustrate our proposals with some real-life examples

    KW - Environmental monitoring

    KW - Participatory sensing

    KW - Uncertainty management

    KW - Software agents

    M3 - Conference article in proceedings

    SN - 978-88-9035-742-8

    BT - iEMSs 2012 Proceedings

    A2 - Seppelt, R.

    A2 - Voinov, A.A.

    A2 - Lange, S.

    A2 - Bankamp, D.

    ER -

    Rönkkö M, Kotovirta V, Karatzas K, Bastin L, Stocker M, Kolehmainen M. Proactive Environmental Systems: The Next Generation of Environmental Monitoring. In Seppelt R, Voinov AA, Lange S, Bankamp D, editors, iEMSs 2012 Proceedings. 2012. 8