Abstract
Engineering design for structural safety is largely based on the
statistics of natural hazards. These statistics are utilized by applying
the theory of extremes, which predicts a cumulative distribution
function of the extreme events. The parameters of this distribution are
found by a fit to the historical extremes and the probabilities of
potentially disastrous events are then calculated. It is pointed out
here that this procedure often results in underestimation of the risk.
This is because wrong probability plotting positions are widely used and
because theoretical extreme value distributions are asymptotic only, so
that in many cases they bring misleading information to the analysis.
The means to avoid these problems in the extreme value analysis are
outlined.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 405-419 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Structural Safety |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- extremes
- extreme value analysis
- probabilistic design
- structural safety
- return period
- plotting positions
- risk analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Problems in the extreme value analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 93 Citations
- 1 Article
-
Closure to "Problems in the extreme value analysis" (Struct. Safety 2008:30:405-419)
Makkonen, L., Pajari, M. & Tikanmäki, M., 2013, In: Structural Safety. 40, p. 65-67Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
Open Access16 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver