Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia

Mark van Gils, Ilkka Korhonen, Arvi Yli-Hankala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-218
Number of pages32
JournalCritical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Volume45
Issue number1-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Neurology
Bioelectric potentials
Electroencephalography

Cite this

van Gils, Mark ; Korhonen, Ilkka ; Yli-Hankala, Arvi. / Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia. In: Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 1-6. pp. 187-218.
@article{9adb8e6a16b346de95ea9225680b0d86,
title = "Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia",
abstract = "Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.",
author = "{van Gils}, Mark and Ilkka Korhonen and Arvi Yli-Hankala",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v45.i1-6.100",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "187--218",
journal = "Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "0278-940X",
publisher = "Begell House Inc.",
number = "1-6",

}

Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia. / van Gils, Mark; Korhonen, Ilkka; Yli-Hankala, Arvi.

In: Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 45, No. 1-6, 01.01.2017, p. 187-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia

AU - van Gils, Mark

AU - Korhonen, Ilkka

AU - Yli-Hankala, Arvi

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.

AB - Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059246765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v45.i1-6.100

DO - 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v45.i1-6.100

M3 - Article

C2 - 29953379

AN - SCOPUS:85059246765

VL - 45

SP - 187

EP - 218

JO - Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

JF - Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

SN - 0278-940X

IS - 1-6

ER -