TY - JOUR
T1 - Procedures for Evaluating the Adequacy of Anesthesia
AU - van Gils, Mark
AU - Korhonen, Ilkka
AU - Yli-Hankala, Arvi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by Begell House, Inc. www.begellhouse.com.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.
AB - Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059246765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v45.i1-6.100
DO - 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v45.i1-6.100
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 29953379
AN - SCOPUS:85059246765
SN - 0278-940X
VL - 45
SP - 121
EP - 146
JO - Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
JF - Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
IS - 1-6
ER -