TY - BOOK
T1 - Proteomics – Challenges and possibilities in Finland
AU - Siitari, Harri
AU - Koivistoinen, Heini
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - The discipline of proteomics, i.e. simultaneous analysis of all the
proteins in a cell at a given point in time, is undergoing strong development
and growth. The market is estimated to be worth USD 2.9 billion in 2005. A
recent report by the Cambridge Healthtech Institute estimated the expenditure
on proteomics to increase by 15% to 50% in 2003, compared with 2002. Major
areas of increase were sample preparation (increase in two- and
multi-dimensional liquid chromatography systems) and mass spectrometric
analysis. Of the estimated USD 2.9 billion proteomics market in 2005,
two-dimensional sample separation is expected to account for approximately
30%. Regarding protein analysis, 300% more mass spectra were expected to be
generated in 2003, compared with 2002. Interestingly, the biggest increase in
market value was envisaged for protein chips.
In proteomics, Finland is lagging behind countries such as Sweden, Denmark and
Netherlands. There has been no focused investment to form bigger core
facilities, as done in other countries. In Finland, proteome analysis is
mainly performed in university laboratories whose remit is to serve the needs
of academic research. The Finnish biotechnology industry has not used the
capabilities of proteomics technology to full potential. This appears to be
partly due to poor awareness of the services available.
To achieve high throughput, proteomic methods need to be further automated and
standardised. New technology is needed to accomplish this. Microarrays (e.g.
protein or antibody arrays) present an interesting technology platform for
future exploitation. The first protein chip products are already on the
market, and the field is expected to continue to develop rapidly. So far,
there is not sufficient content (i.e. characterised proteins, antibodies,
etc.) to be spotted onto the chips. Protein arrays evidently possess high
potential to resolve many of today’s unresolved bottlenecks in proteome
analysis. Array technology may open new avenues for functional proteomics and,
later on, for clinical proteomics. The development of clinically relevant
content for next-generation proteomics and the application of new technologies
such as microfluidistics present additional future business opportunities in
Finland.
During the past few years. proteomics has evolved as intellectual
property-intensive activity. The number of proteomics-related patent
applications has doubled every year since the early days of proteomics. The
great majority of the applications (60%) have been filed in the USA, followed
by Japan and Germany. Interestingly, China is among the top four countries, in
front of the United Kingdom and France. Finland lags behind in proteome
patent applications, too. As the field is young and developing rapidly, the
rate of seeking intellectual property rights protection will probably be
maintained at least at the current level for some time.
In Finland, like elsewhere in the world, proteomics offers a new means to
improve the competitiveness of the bioindustry. Proteomics can help to enhance
the efficiency and control of the processes used in the biotechnology
industry to produce bioactive compounds. New targets for drug development can
be identified and validated, diagnostics can be improved by proteomic
profiling, and novel biomarkers can be found. Applicable to the theranostics
and personalised medicine of the future, the more precise biomarkers will
bring diagnostic and clinical research capabilities to new levels. In Finland,
these potentials in combination existing sample collections, capabilities to
perform clinical studies and clinical expertise offer additional competitive
edge.
Many Finnish companies would already benefit from the new data obtainable by
proteomics methods. The existence and range of the current services would need
to be better communicated to Finnish companies. It is therefore proposed that
an open planning meeting be arranged to touch off the communication between
service providers and users. Furthermore, the services in Finland would need
to be developed further in terms of quality, robustness, throughput and
pricing. For the future, a new technology development programme should be
drawn up to take advantage of the current business window in proteomics. With
its clinical expertise, potential for technology development. re-agent
manufacturing skills and software development capabilities, Finland is well
geared to deal with this challenge.
AB - The discipline of proteomics, i.e. simultaneous analysis of all the
proteins in a cell at a given point in time, is undergoing strong development
and growth. The market is estimated to be worth USD 2.9 billion in 2005. A
recent report by the Cambridge Healthtech Institute estimated the expenditure
on proteomics to increase by 15% to 50% in 2003, compared with 2002. Major
areas of increase were sample preparation (increase in two- and
multi-dimensional liquid chromatography systems) and mass spectrometric
analysis. Of the estimated USD 2.9 billion proteomics market in 2005,
two-dimensional sample separation is expected to account for approximately
30%. Regarding protein analysis, 300% more mass spectra were expected to be
generated in 2003, compared with 2002. Interestingly, the biggest increase in
market value was envisaged for protein chips.
In proteomics, Finland is lagging behind countries such as Sweden, Denmark and
Netherlands. There has been no focused investment to form bigger core
facilities, as done in other countries. In Finland, proteome analysis is
mainly performed in university laboratories whose remit is to serve the needs
of academic research. The Finnish biotechnology industry has not used the
capabilities of proteomics technology to full potential. This appears to be
partly due to poor awareness of the services available.
To achieve high throughput, proteomic methods need to be further automated and
standardised. New technology is needed to accomplish this. Microarrays (e.g.
protein or antibody arrays) present an interesting technology platform for
future exploitation. The first protein chip products are already on the
market, and the field is expected to continue to develop rapidly. So far,
there is not sufficient content (i.e. characterised proteins, antibodies,
etc.) to be spotted onto the chips. Protein arrays evidently possess high
potential to resolve many of today’s unresolved bottlenecks in proteome
analysis. Array technology may open new avenues for functional proteomics and,
later on, for clinical proteomics. The development of clinically relevant
content for next-generation proteomics and the application of new technologies
such as microfluidistics present additional future business opportunities in
Finland.
During the past few years. proteomics has evolved as intellectual
property-intensive activity. The number of proteomics-related patent
applications has doubled every year since the early days of proteomics. The
great majority of the applications (60%) have been filed in the USA, followed
by Japan and Germany. Interestingly, China is among the top four countries, in
front of the United Kingdom and France. Finland lags behind in proteome
patent applications, too. As the field is young and developing rapidly, the
rate of seeking intellectual property rights protection will probably be
maintained at least at the current level for some time.
In Finland, like elsewhere in the world, proteomics offers a new means to
improve the competitiveness of the bioindustry. Proteomics can help to enhance
the efficiency and control of the processes used in the biotechnology
industry to produce bioactive compounds. New targets for drug development can
be identified and validated, diagnostics can be improved by proteomic
profiling, and novel biomarkers can be found. Applicable to the theranostics
and personalised medicine of the future, the more precise biomarkers will
bring diagnostic and clinical research capabilities to new levels. In Finland,
these potentials in combination existing sample collections, capabilities to
perform clinical studies and clinical expertise offer additional competitive
edge.
Many Finnish companies would already benefit from the new data obtainable by
proteomics methods. The existence and range of the current services would need
to be better communicated to Finnish companies. It is therefore proposed that
an open planning meeting be arranged to touch off the communication between
service providers and users. Furthermore, the services in Finland would need
to be developed further in terms of quality, robustness, throughput and
pricing. For the future, a new technology development programme should be
drawn up to take advantage of the current business window in proteomics. With
its clinical expertise, potential for technology development. re-agent
manufacturing skills and software development capabilities, Finland is well
geared to deal with this challenge.
M3 - Report
SN - 952-457-167-6
T3 - Technology Review
BT - Proteomics – Challenges and possibilities in Finland
PB - TEKES
CY - Helsinki
ER -