Qualitative Risk Analysis

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter or book articleProfessional

    Abstract

    Qualitative risk analysis is an essential part of risk management framework and risk assessment process in all organizations. Qualitative risk analysis is a management technique concerned with examining the probability of a risky event and the impact of the risk if it occurs. All risks have both probability and impact that characterizes the risk. Probability is the likelihood that a risk event will occur, and impact is the significance of the consequences of the risk event. The two primary functions of a qualitative risk analysis are risk identification and risk estimation. Qualitative risk analysis requires that the probability and consequences of the risks be evaluated using established qualitative-analysis methods and tools. In this chapter, the theoretical basis for qualitative risk analysis principles, typical qualitative methods, and experiences of their use are presented. In addition to that the overall systems engineering viewpoints to systematic risk assessment and the need for qualitative risk analysis methods in different safety engineering domains are discussed in this chapter. New digital technology increases the complexity of the systems and introduces new potential unexperienced causal factors. This implies that proactive analysis and control of system hazards is growing increasingly important. Qualitative risk analysis techniques, which have long been used in industries that use dangerous processes and for other hazardous systems, can identify the causes of accidents that have never occurred before. Qualitative risk analysis methods have certain strengths, for example, they are relatively quick and easy to set up; they allow risks to be considered very early in the system lifecycle; they provide the means to systematically and thoroughly examine a system, process, or procedure; and the simple risk matrix provides a rapid ranking of risks into different significance levels. Practical experiences have also shown that systematic analysis of system operations and system functions by using qualitative PHA, OHA, and HAZOP methods bring out a great deal of useful information that are not directly related to safety but do have links to system availability, system usability, and system reliability. On the other hand, qualitative risk analysis methods are said to be not comprehensive, neither do they provide detailed information on risks and how risks can best be prevented. Methods rely heavily on the expertise of the analysts who may find it difficult to be sufficiently objective. It is also argued that risk matrices should be used with caution. Risk management decisions cannot be based in principle only on mapping of ordered category ratings of severity and probability factors to recommendations for actions or priorities. Strengths, uncertainties, and limitations of the qualitative risk analysis methods and analysis techniques as well as experiences and criticism are discussed more in this chapter.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHandbook of Safety Principles
    EditorsNiklas Möller, Sven Ove Hansson, Jan-Erik Holmberg, Carl Rollenhagen
    PublisherWiley
    Chapter21
    Pages463-492
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-1194-4307-0
    ISBN (Print)978-1-1189-5069-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018
    MoE publication typeD2 Article in professional manuals or guides or professional information systems or text book material

    Fingerprint

    Risk analysis
    Event risk
    Risk management
    Factors
    Safety
    Risk assessment
    Systematic risk
    Criticism
    Industry
    Uncertainty
    Ranking
    Accidents
    Management decisions
    Systems engineering
    Qualitative methods
    Rating
    Risk identification
    Severity
    Hazard
    Life cycle

    Keywords

    • qualitative risk analysis
    • risk assessment
    • risk identification
    • risk matrix
    • safety engineering

    Cite this

    Tiusanen, R. (2018). Qualitative Risk Analysis. In N. Möller, S. O. Hansson, J-E. Holmberg, & C. Rollenhagen (Eds.), Handbook of Safety Principles (pp. 463-492). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119443070.ch21
    Tiusanen, Risto. / Qualitative Risk Analysis. Handbook of Safety Principles. editor / Niklas Möller ; Sven Ove Hansson ; Jan-Erik Holmberg ; Carl Rollenhagen. Wiley, 2018. pp. 463-492
    @inbook{68ef2866876d4b33a25979736b1c4fbf,
    title = "Qualitative Risk Analysis",
    abstract = "Qualitative risk analysis is an essential part of risk management framework and risk assessment process in all organizations. Qualitative risk analysis is a management technique concerned with examining the probability of a risky event and the impact of the risk if it occurs. All risks have both probability and impact that characterizes the risk. Probability is the likelihood that a risk event will occur, and impact is the significance of the consequences of the risk event. The two primary functions of a qualitative risk analysis are risk identification and risk estimation. Qualitative risk analysis requires that the probability and consequences of the risks be evaluated using established qualitative-analysis methods and tools. In this chapter, the theoretical basis for qualitative risk analysis principles, typical qualitative methods, and experiences of their use are presented. In addition to that the overall systems engineering viewpoints to systematic risk assessment and the need for qualitative risk analysis methods in different safety engineering domains are discussed in this chapter. New digital technology increases the complexity of the systems and introduces new potential unexperienced causal factors. This implies that proactive analysis and control of system hazards is growing increasingly important. Qualitative risk analysis techniques, which have long been used in industries that use dangerous processes and for other hazardous systems, can identify the causes of accidents that have never occurred before. Qualitative risk analysis methods have certain strengths, for example, they are relatively quick and easy to set up; they allow risks to be considered very early in the system lifecycle; they provide the means to systematically and thoroughly examine a system, process, or procedure; and the simple risk matrix provides a rapid ranking of risks into different significance levels. Practical experiences have also shown that systematic analysis of system operations and system functions by using qualitative PHA, OHA, and HAZOP methods bring out a great deal of useful information that are not directly related to safety but do have links to system availability, system usability, and system reliability. On the other hand, qualitative risk analysis methods are said to be not comprehensive, neither do they provide detailed information on risks and how risks can best be prevented. Methods rely heavily on the expertise of the analysts who may find it difficult to be sufficiently objective. It is also argued that risk matrices should be used with caution. Risk management decisions cannot be based in principle only on mapping of ordered category ratings of severity and probability factors to recommendations for actions or priorities. Strengths, uncertainties, and limitations of the qualitative risk analysis methods and analysis techniques as well as experiences and criticism are discussed more in this chapter.",
    keywords = "qualitative risk analysis, risk assessment, risk identification, risk matrix, safety engineering",
    author = "Risto Tiusanen",
    note = "Project: 71112",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1002/9781119443070.ch21",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-1189-5069-2",
    pages = "463--492",
    editor = "Niklas M{\"o}ller and Hansson, {Sven Ove } and Jan-Erik Holmberg and Carl Rollenhagen",
    booktitle = "Handbook of Safety Principles",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    address = "United States",

    }

    Tiusanen, R 2018, Qualitative Risk Analysis. in N Möller, SO Hansson, J-E Holmberg & C Rollenhagen (eds), Handbook of Safety Principles. Wiley, pp. 463-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119443070.ch21

    Qualitative Risk Analysis. / Tiusanen, Risto.

    Handbook of Safety Principles. ed. / Niklas Möller; Sven Ove Hansson; Jan-Erik Holmberg; Carl Rollenhagen. Wiley, 2018. p. 463-492.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter or book articleProfessional

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Qualitative Risk Analysis

    AU - Tiusanen, Risto

    N1 - Project: 71112

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - Qualitative risk analysis is an essential part of risk management framework and risk assessment process in all organizations. Qualitative risk analysis is a management technique concerned with examining the probability of a risky event and the impact of the risk if it occurs. All risks have both probability and impact that characterizes the risk. Probability is the likelihood that a risk event will occur, and impact is the significance of the consequences of the risk event. The two primary functions of a qualitative risk analysis are risk identification and risk estimation. Qualitative risk analysis requires that the probability and consequences of the risks be evaluated using established qualitative-analysis methods and tools. In this chapter, the theoretical basis for qualitative risk analysis principles, typical qualitative methods, and experiences of their use are presented. In addition to that the overall systems engineering viewpoints to systematic risk assessment and the need for qualitative risk analysis methods in different safety engineering domains are discussed in this chapter. New digital technology increases the complexity of the systems and introduces new potential unexperienced causal factors. This implies that proactive analysis and control of system hazards is growing increasingly important. Qualitative risk analysis techniques, which have long been used in industries that use dangerous processes and for other hazardous systems, can identify the causes of accidents that have never occurred before. Qualitative risk analysis methods have certain strengths, for example, they are relatively quick and easy to set up; they allow risks to be considered very early in the system lifecycle; they provide the means to systematically and thoroughly examine a system, process, or procedure; and the simple risk matrix provides a rapid ranking of risks into different significance levels. Practical experiences have also shown that systematic analysis of system operations and system functions by using qualitative PHA, OHA, and HAZOP methods bring out a great deal of useful information that are not directly related to safety but do have links to system availability, system usability, and system reliability. On the other hand, qualitative risk analysis methods are said to be not comprehensive, neither do they provide detailed information on risks and how risks can best be prevented. Methods rely heavily on the expertise of the analysts who may find it difficult to be sufficiently objective. It is also argued that risk matrices should be used with caution. Risk management decisions cannot be based in principle only on mapping of ordered category ratings of severity and probability factors to recommendations for actions or priorities. Strengths, uncertainties, and limitations of the qualitative risk analysis methods and analysis techniques as well as experiences and criticism are discussed more in this chapter.

    AB - Qualitative risk analysis is an essential part of risk management framework and risk assessment process in all organizations. Qualitative risk analysis is a management technique concerned with examining the probability of a risky event and the impact of the risk if it occurs. All risks have both probability and impact that characterizes the risk. Probability is the likelihood that a risk event will occur, and impact is the significance of the consequences of the risk event. The two primary functions of a qualitative risk analysis are risk identification and risk estimation. Qualitative risk analysis requires that the probability and consequences of the risks be evaluated using established qualitative-analysis methods and tools. In this chapter, the theoretical basis for qualitative risk analysis principles, typical qualitative methods, and experiences of their use are presented. In addition to that the overall systems engineering viewpoints to systematic risk assessment and the need for qualitative risk analysis methods in different safety engineering domains are discussed in this chapter. New digital technology increases the complexity of the systems and introduces new potential unexperienced causal factors. This implies that proactive analysis and control of system hazards is growing increasingly important. Qualitative risk analysis techniques, which have long been used in industries that use dangerous processes and for other hazardous systems, can identify the causes of accidents that have never occurred before. Qualitative risk analysis methods have certain strengths, for example, they are relatively quick and easy to set up; they allow risks to be considered very early in the system lifecycle; they provide the means to systematically and thoroughly examine a system, process, or procedure; and the simple risk matrix provides a rapid ranking of risks into different significance levels. Practical experiences have also shown that systematic analysis of system operations and system functions by using qualitative PHA, OHA, and HAZOP methods bring out a great deal of useful information that are not directly related to safety but do have links to system availability, system usability, and system reliability. On the other hand, qualitative risk analysis methods are said to be not comprehensive, neither do they provide detailed information on risks and how risks can best be prevented. Methods rely heavily on the expertise of the analysts who may find it difficult to be sufficiently objective. It is also argued that risk matrices should be used with caution. Risk management decisions cannot be based in principle only on mapping of ordered category ratings of severity and probability factors to recommendations for actions or priorities. Strengths, uncertainties, and limitations of the qualitative risk analysis methods and analysis techniques as well as experiences and criticism are discussed more in this chapter.

    KW - qualitative risk analysis

    KW - risk assessment

    KW - risk identification

    KW - risk matrix

    KW - safety engineering

    U2 - 10.1002/9781119443070.ch21

    DO - 10.1002/9781119443070.ch21

    M3 - Chapter or book article

    SN - 978-1-1189-5069-2

    SP - 463

    EP - 492

    BT - Handbook of Safety Principles

    A2 - Möller, Niklas

    A2 - Hansson, Sven Ove

    A2 - Holmberg, Jan-Erik

    A2 - Rollenhagen, Carl

    PB - Wiley

    ER -

    Tiusanen R. Qualitative Risk Analysis. In Möller N, Hansson SO, Holmberg J-E, Rollenhagen C, editors, Handbook of Safety Principles. Wiley. 2018. p. 463-492 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119443070.ch21