Quality factors, such as the level of documentation, coverage of hazard identification and accuracy of consequence estimation, affect the use of results and the cost-effectiveness of analyses. This paper reviews the potential for quality evaluation, and presents results from several comparable quality investigations. The paper also presents a new method for quality evaluation and management during the different phases of an analysis. Some preliminary results from the check list method are also included.
|Journal||Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries|
|Publication status||Published - 1989|
|MoE publication type||A1 Journal article-refereed|