Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0

Kim Wallin (Corresponding Author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    81 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)303-328
    Number of pages26
    JournalEngineering Fracture Mechanics
    Volume68
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Superconducting transition temperature
    Fracture toughness
    Brittle fracture
    Geometry
    Testing
    Repair
    Cracks

    Keywords

    • master curve
    • constraint
    • T stress
    • brittle fracture
    • shallow flaws

    Cite this

    @article{23bff46135274c93acc13f407086e8c8,
    title = "Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0",
    abstract = "Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.",
    keywords = "master curve, constraint, T stress, brittle fracture, shallow flaws",
    author = "Kim Wallin",
    note = "Project code: V9SU00198",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00067-9",
    language = "English",
    volume = "68",
    pages = "303--328",
    journal = "Engineering Fracture Mechanics",
    issn = "0013-7944",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "3",

    }

    Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0. / Wallin, Kim (Corresponding Author).

    In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2001, p. 303-328.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0

    AU - Wallin, Kim

    N1 - Project code: V9SU00198

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.

    AB - Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.

    KW - master curve

    KW - constraint

    KW - T stress

    KW - brittle fracture

    KW - shallow flaws

    U2 - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00067-9

    DO - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00067-9

    M3 - Article

    VL - 68

    SP - 303

    EP - 328

    JO - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

    JF - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

    SN - 0013-7944

    IS - 3

    ER -