Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0

Kim Wallin (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-328
Number of pages26
JournalEngineering Fracture Mechanics
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Superconducting transition temperature
Fracture toughness
Brittle fracture
Geometry
Testing
Repair
Cracks

Keywords

  • master curve
  • constraint
  • T stress
  • brittle fracture
  • shallow flaws

Cite this

@article{23bff46135274c93acc13f407086e8c8,
title = "Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0",
abstract = "Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.",
keywords = "master curve, constraint, T stress, brittle fracture, shallow flaws",
author = "Kim Wallin",
note = "Project code: V9SU00198",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00067-9",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "303--328",
journal = "Engineering Fracture Mechanics",
issn = "0013-7944",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0. / Wallin, Kim (Corresponding Author).

In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2001, p. 303-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0

AU - Wallin, Kim

N1 - Project code: V9SU00198

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.

AB - Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.

KW - master curve

KW - constraint

KW - T stress

KW - brittle fracture

KW - shallow flaws

U2 - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00067-9

DO - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00067-9

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 303

EP - 328

JO - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

JF - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

SN - 0013-7944

IS - 3

ER -