Abstract
It is generally accepted that scientific disciplines such
as psychology, sociology, and anthropology contribute
beneficially to design by providing understanding of
users' needs, experiences, and desires. Arguably,
however, these disciplines have more to contribute,
because they include theories and models that can be
applied as design frames and principles. More
specifically, goal-setting, visualization, thematization,
and conceptual reconfiguration are general mechanisms
through which theories translate into design
contributions. Actualizing radical design solutions via
these mechanisms is discussed: theories provide
appropriate means of abstraction, which allows 'distance'
from user data; departure from the existing design and
user paradigms toward 'what has not yet been imagined' is
thereby possible. These suggestions draw from and are
exemplified by a ship bridge design case.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 857-877 |
Journal | The Design Journal |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- case study
- design knowledge
- design theory
- framing
- social theory