Abstract
Lately project delivery methods where the implementer offers broader
service packages are increasingly used in infrastructure projects worldwide.
At the same time, the number of alternative project delivery methods has
increased making selection of the best one difficult. The road authority must
understand the features of the methods in order to select the most effective
ones in terms of economic efficiency. To assist in the selection, this
research compared the operating principles and performance of
design-bid-build, construction management, design-build (DB), and
design-build-maintain (DBM) based on an international interview survey and an
extensive literature review. Opinions presented by the interviewees and
literature review all pointed to the same direction. Based on the analysis of
road procurement, broader service packages give, on average, better value for
the money and enable clients to attain their goals better than more
traditional methods. DB and DBM seem to outperform more conservative
procurement methods both in cost and value generation terms. Each method,
however, is particularly suitable for specific projects and should be selected
accordingly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 321-329 |
Journal | Journal of Infrastructure Systems |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- road construction
- road construction and maintenance operations
- road design
- road management
- road procurement