Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices

Nina Urala, Liisa Lähteenmäki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

182 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine what reasons consumers give for either choosing or not choosing functional foods. Laddering interviews were used to find out how consumers described their reasons for choosing functional food alternatives in different product categories and how these descriptions are linked with values. Yoghurt, spread, juice, carbonated soft drinks, sweets and ice cream were used as example product categories. In total, five central means‐end chains, describing the product attributes, consequences and values behind respondents’ food choices, were found, which referred to healthiness, taste and pleasure, security and familiarity, convenience and price. They were found to be independent from each other and had different connotations depending on the product category. The results indicate that respondents did not see functional foods as one homogenous group over different product categories. Instead, consumers seemed to perceive functional products as a member of the general product category such as yoghurt or spread and only secondarily as a functional food.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-158
Number of pages11
JournalNutrition and Food Science
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Functional Food
food choices
functional foods
Carbonated Beverages
Yogurt
yogurt
Ice Cream
soft drinks
Pleasure
ice cream
cream
juices
interviews
Interviews
Food
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Consumer Behaviour
  • Food and Drink
  • Product Attributes

Cite this

Urala, Nina ; Lähteenmäki, Liisa. / Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices. In: Nutrition and Food Science. 2003 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 148-158.
@article{3b5b7878c8024ab582072f1d3f354c2a,
title = "Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to examine what reasons consumers give for either choosing or not choosing functional foods. Laddering interviews were used to find out how consumers described their reasons for choosing functional food alternatives in different product categories and how these descriptions are linked with values. Yoghurt, spread, juice, carbonated soft drinks, sweets and ice cream were used as example product categories. In total, five central means‐end chains, describing the product attributes, consequences and values behind respondents’ food choices, were found, which referred to healthiness, taste and pleasure, security and familiarity, convenience and price. They were found to be independent from each other and had different connotations depending on the product category. The results indicate that respondents did not see functional foods as one homogenous group over different product categories. Instead, consumers seemed to perceive functional products as a member of the general product category such as yoghurt or spread and only secondarily as a functional food.",
keywords = "Consumer Behaviour, Food and Drink, Product Attributes",
author = "Nina Urala and Liisa L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1108/00346650310488499",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "148--158",
journal = "Nutrition and Food Science",
issn = "0034-6659",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices. / Urala, Nina; Lähteenmäki, Liisa.

In: Nutrition and Food Science, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2003, p. 148-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices

AU - Urala, Nina

AU - Lähteenmäki, Liisa

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The aim of this study was to examine what reasons consumers give for either choosing or not choosing functional foods. Laddering interviews were used to find out how consumers described their reasons for choosing functional food alternatives in different product categories and how these descriptions are linked with values. Yoghurt, spread, juice, carbonated soft drinks, sweets and ice cream were used as example product categories. In total, five central means‐end chains, describing the product attributes, consequences and values behind respondents’ food choices, were found, which referred to healthiness, taste and pleasure, security and familiarity, convenience and price. They were found to be independent from each other and had different connotations depending on the product category. The results indicate that respondents did not see functional foods as one homogenous group over different product categories. Instead, consumers seemed to perceive functional products as a member of the general product category such as yoghurt or spread and only secondarily as a functional food.

AB - The aim of this study was to examine what reasons consumers give for either choosing or not choosing functional foods. Laddering interviews were used to find out how consumers described their reasons for choosing functional food alternatives in different product categories and how these descriptions are linked with values. Yoghurt, spread, juice, carbonated soft drinks, sweets and ice cream were used as example product categories. In total, five central means‐end chains, describing the product attributes, consequences and values behind respondents’ food choices, were found, which referred to healthiness, taste and pleasure, security and familiarity, convenience and price. They were found to be independent from each other and had different connotations depending on the product category. The results indicate that respondents did not see functional foods as one homogenous group over different product categories. Instead, consumers seemed to perceive functional products as a member of the general product category such as yoghurt or spread and only secondarily as a functional food.

KW - Consumer Behaviour

KW - Food and Drink

KW - Product Attributes

U2 - 10.1108/00346650310488499

DO - 10.1108/00346650310488499

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 148

EP - 158

JO - Nutrition and Food Science

JF - Nutrition and Food Science

SN - 0034-6659

IS - 4

ER -