TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconfigurable NanoFETs
T2 - Performance Projections for Multiple-Top-Gate Architectures
AU - Moura, Rebeca
AU - Tiencken, Nils
AU - Mothes, Sven
AU - Claus, Martin
AU - Blawid, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received January 28, 2018; accepted February 27, 2018. Date of publication March 5, 2018; date of current version May 8, 2018. This work was supported by the CAPES via Project NAnoPiE, 88881.030371/2013-01 and in part by the DFG via Project CL384/2. The review of this paper was arranged by Associate Editor C. W. Liu. (Corresponding author: Stefan Blawid.) R. Moura and S. Blawid are with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília 70919-970, Brazil (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2002-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - In nanowire or nanotube field-effect transistors (nanoFETs) electrostatic doping can be induced by electrical fields originating from multiple independent gates. Therefore, nanoFETs are predestined to explore reconfigurability. Solving the coupled nonlinear Poisson and drift-diffusion differential equations for the three-dimensional electrostatic potential and the one-dimensional channel charge, respectively, we predict the performance of four different reconfigurable (R) nanoFET geometries. The investigated architectures compass FETs with one (1G), two (2G), and three top-gate (3G) terminals with a moderate channel length of half a micrometer. Therefore, the theoretically investigated R-nanoFETs can be manufactured at low costs, allowing to test the performance projections claimed in this paper. The 2G R-nanoFET proved to be the most versatile architecture when no application specific optimization is attempted. However, all considered geometries offer interesting properties. Shortening the program gate with the drain simplifies the local routing and only slightly diminish the performance. A smaller footprint 1G R-nanoFET delivers comparable intrinsic gains at the cost of increased static power dissipation. Finally, a 3G R-nanoFET enables additional dynamic configuration options and faster on/off switching due to a control gate positioned at an increased distance to other metallic contacts.
AB - In nanowire or nanotube field-effect transistors (nanoFETs) electrostatic doping can be induced by electrical fields originating from multiple independent gates. Therefore, nanoFETs are predestined to explore reconfigurability. Solving the coupled nonlinear Poisson and drift-diffusion differential equations for the three-dimensional electrostatic potential and the one-dimensional channel charge, respectively, we predict the performance of four different reconfigurable (R) nanoFET geometries. The investigated architectures compass FETs with one (1G), two (2G), and three top-gate (3G) terminals with a moderate channel length of half a micrometer. Therefore, the theoretically investigated R-nanoFETs can be manufactured at low costs, allowing to test the performance projections claimed in this paper. The 2G R-nanoFET proved to be the most versatile architecture when no application specific optimization is attempted. However, all considered geometries offer interesting properties. Shortening the program gate with the drain simplifies the local routing and only slightly diminish the performance. A smaller footprint 1G R-nanoFET delivers comparable intrinsic gains at the cost of increased static power dissipation. Finally, a 3G R-nanoFET enables additional dynamic configuration options and faster on/off switching due to a control gate positioned at an increased distance to other metallic contacts.
KW - electrostatic doping
KW - multiple-gate FET
KW - nanoFET
KW - nanotube
KW - nanowire
KW - Reconfigurable transistor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042884157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TNANO.2018.2812361
DO - 10.1109/TNANO.2018.2812361
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042884157
SN - 1536-125X
VL - 17
SP - 467
EP - 474
JO - IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology
JF - IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology
IS - 3
ER -