Abstract
We explain that the extant framing of research relevance
is skewed because it is centred upon irrelevance of much
research knowledge to practitioners, while excluding or
under emphasising the irrelevance of much practice
knowledge to practitioners. Moreover, the current framing
is skewed because the extant literature disregards the
very common collaboration between researchers and
practitioners. In addition, we explain that the current
framing of research relevance is indistinct because
theory, practice, and relevance are discussed in vague
terms rather than specific terms. Furthermore, the
current framing of research relevance is indistinct
because there is little reference to theory knowledge. We
argue that current skewed and indistinct framing obscures
the complexity of relevance. As a result, overly
simplistic assertions have been made about how relevance
can be increased. We broaden and balance the framing of
research relevance. We provide greater specificity in the
explanation of factors that contribute to the complexity
of relevance. We provide recommendations for addressing
the complexity of relevance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 457-465 |
Journal | European Management Journal |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- Relevance of research
- Theory and practice
- Applied research
- Complexity