Regenerative Work as a Method: Challenging Economic Innovation Assumptions

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference AbstractScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Dominant innovation paradigms centre on productivity and technological advancement, often sidelining social and ecological dimensions of economic development. This paper addresses this gap by exploring how regenerative work can serve as a conceptual foundation for rethinking the relationship between work, innovation, and economic growth.
We present a conceptual model developed during the framing phase of a national foresight initiative in Finland. The model draws on early weak signal analysis and expert interviews to identify key elements of an alternative innovation logic grounded in human and ecological flourishing. It highlights how new priorities, structures, and productivity conceptions can emerge when innovation is viewed through regenerative principles.
As part of this contribution, we propose a tentative definition of regenerative working life. The paper offers both theoretical and practical insights, suggesting a conceptual basis for reflection on emerging alternatives in innovation policy and practice. While the results are tentative and based on early-phase inquiry, they lay a foundation for future empirical research aimed at testing and refining the model.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 2025
MoE publication typeNot Eligible
Event26th CINet Conference: Bridging Deep Tech and People-Centtric Innovation - Lucerne, Switzerland
Duration: 7 Sept 20269 Sept 2026
https://cinet.org/events/conferences/2025.html

Conference

Conference26th CINet Conference
Country/TerritorySwitzerland
CityLucerne,
Period7/09/269/09/26
Internet address

Keywords

  • Regenerative work
  • innovation systems
  • Economic growth
  • Strategic Foresight
  • Human-centric innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regenerative Work as a Method: Challenging Economic Innovation Assumptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this