Reliability analysis of a glulam beam

Tomi Toratti, Simon Schnabl, Goran Turk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present case study is an example of the use of reliability analysis to asses the failure probability of a tapered glulam beam. This beam is part of a true structure built for a super market in the town of Kokemäki in Finland. The reliability analysis is carried out using the snow load statistics available from the site and on material strength information available from previous experiments. The Eurocode 5 and the Finnish building code are used as the deterministic methods to which the probabilistic method is compared to. The calculations show that the effect of the strength variation is not significant, when the coefficient of variation of the strength is around 15% as usually assumed for glulam. The probability of failure resulting from a deterministic design based on Eurocode 5 is low compared to the target values and lower sections are possible if applying a probabilistic design method. In fire design, if a 60 min resistance is required, this is not the case according to Eurocode 5 design procedures, a higher section would be required. However, a probabilistic based fire analysis results in bounds for the yearly probability of failure which are comparable to the target value and to the values obtained from the normal probabilistic based design.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-293
JournalStructural Safety
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Reliability analysis
Fires
Snow
Statistics
Experiments

Keywords

  • reliability
  • eurocode
  • design
  • glulam
  • fire

Cite this

Toratti, Tomi ; Schnabl, Simon ; Turk, Goran. / Reliability analysis of a glulam beam. In: Structural Safety. 2007 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 279-293.
@article{7e290526f298435aae867dde168a5ddd,
title = "Reliability analysis of a glulam beam",
abstract = "The present case study is an example of the use of reliability analysis to asses the failure probability of a tapered glulam beam. This beam is part of a true structure built for a super market in the town of Kokem{\"a}ki in Finland. The reliability analysis is carried out using the snow load statistics available from the site and on material strength information available from previous experiments. The Eurocode 5 and the Finnish building code are used as the deterministic methods to which the probabilistic method is compared to. The calculations show that the effect of the strength variation is not significant, when the coefficient of variation of the strength is around 15{\%} as usually assumed for glulam. The probability of failure resulting from a deterministic design based on Eurocode 5 is low compared to the target values and lower sections are possible if applying a probabilistic design method. In fire design, if a 60 min resistance is required, this is not the case according to Eurocode 5 design procedures, a higher section would be required. However, a probabilistic based fire analysis results in bounds for the yearly probability of failure which are comparable to the target value and to the values obtained from the normal probabilistic based design.",
keywords = "reliability, eurocode, design, glulam, fire",
author = "Tomi Toratti and Simon Schnabl and Goran Turk",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.011",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "279--293",
journal = "Structural Safety",
issn = "0167-4730",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Toratti, T, Schnabl, S & Turk, G 2007, 'Reliability analysis of a glulam beam', Structural Safety, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.011

Reliability analysis of a glulam beam. / Toratti, Tomi; Schnabl, Simon; Turk, Goran.

In: Structural Safety, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2007, p. 279-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability analysis of a glulam beam

AU - Toratti, Tomi

AU - Schnabl, Simon

AU - Turk, Goran

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The present case study is an example of the use of reliability analysis to asses the failure probability of a tapered glulam beam. This beam is part of a true structure built for a super market in the town of Kokemäki in Finland. The reliability analysis is carried out using the snow load statistics available from the site and on material strength information available from previous experiments. The Eurocode 5 and the Finnish building code are used as the deterministic methods to which the probabilistic method is compared to. The calculations show that the effect of the strength variation is not significant, when the coefficient of variation of the strength is around 15% as usually assumed for glulam. The probability of failure resulting from a deterministic design based on Eurocode 5 is low compared to the target values and lower sections are possible if applying a probabilistic design method. In fire design, if a 60 min resistance is required, this is not the case according to Eurocode 5 design procedures, a higher section would be required. However, a probabilistic based fire analysis results in bounds for the yearly probability of failure which are comparable to the target value and to the values obtained from the normal probabilistic based design.

AB - The present case study is an example of the use of reliability analysis to asses the failure probability of a tapered glulam beam. This beam is part of a true structure built for a super market in the town of Kokemäki in Finland. The reliability analysis is carried out using the snow load statistics available from the site and on material strength information available from previous experiments. The Eurocode 5 and the Finnish building code are used as the deterministic methods to which the probabilistic method is compared to. The calculations show that the effect of the strength variation is not significant, when the coefficient of variation of the strength is around 15% as usually assumed for glulam. The probability of failure resulting from a deterministic design based on Eurocode 5 is low compared to the target values and lower sections are possible if applying a probabilistic design method. In fire design, if a 60 min resistance is required, this is not the case according to Eurocode 5 design procedures, a higher section would be required. However, a probabilistic based fire analysis results in bounds for the yearly probability of failure which are comparable to the target value and to the values obtained from the normal probabilistic based design.

KW - reliability

KW - eurocode

KW - design

KW - glulam

KW - fire

U2 - 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.011

DO - 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.011

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 279

EP - 293

JO - Structural Safety

JF - Structural Safety

SN - 0167-4730

IS - 4

ER -