TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability of destructive leakage detection methods for semirigid retort packages
AU - Hurme, Eero
AU - Wirtanen, Gun
AU - Axelson-Larsson, Lena
AU - Mattila-Sandholm, Tiina
AU - Ahvenainen, Raija
N1 - Project code: BEL3824
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Three different destructive testing methods for package integrity (biotesting, dye penetration and electrical conductance) were compared with each other using intact and leaking retort packages. In biotesting, both vegetative cells of Enterobacter aerogenes and spores of Bacillus subtilis were used as test microbes. The biotest results did not significantly differ from each other, most packages with a 50 μm channel leak through the seal area were contaminated. Biotesting with E. aerogenes was regarded as a more favourable method than testing with spores of B. subtilis since it was easier to perform and gas formation in the packages was a simple indicator for product contamination. The electrolytic test was able to discover most of the leaking packages more reliably than the biotests and the dye penetration test. The dye test had similar sensitivity in identifying leaks to that of the biotests. In conclusion, the microbial integrity of packages should not be estimated only by biotests, even if they are generally regarded as the most severe package integrity test methods.
AB - Three different destructive testing methods for package integrity (biotesting, dye penetration and electrical conductance) were compared with each other using intact and leaking retort packages. In biotesting, both vegetative cells of Enterobacter aerogenes and spores of Bacillus subtilis were used as test microbes. The biotest results did not significantly differ from each other, most packages with a 50 μm channel leak through the seal area were contaminated. Biotesting with E. aerogenes was regarded as a more favourable method than testing with spores of B. subtilis since it was easier to perform and gas formation in the packages was a simple indicator for product contamination. The electrolytic test was able to discover most of the leaking packages more reliably than the biotests and the dye penetration test. The dye test had similar sensitivity in identifying leaks to that of the biotests. In conclusion, the microbial integrity of packages should not be estimated only by biotests, even if they are generally regarded as the most severe package integrity test methods.
U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(199607)9:4<203::AID-PTS365>3.0.CO;2-3
DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(199607)9:4<203::AID-PTS365>3.0.CO;2-3
M3 - Article
SN - 0894-3214
VL - 9
SP - 203
EP - 213
JO - Packaging Technology and Science
JF - Packaging Technology and Science
IS - 4
ER -