Report on challenges for SCIs: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures Deliverable D2.2

G. Walther; M. Jovanovic; M. Vollmer; G. Desmond; A. Choudhary; Z. Székely; J. Sanne; P. Klimek; D. Bezrukov; Raija Koivisto; Riitta Molarius; I. Macsári; I. Stumphauser; T. Knape; L. Bergfors; K. Buhr; A. Jovanovic; N. Albrecht; S. Warkentin; J. Devarajan; K. Tetlak; Pertti Auerkari; Satu Tuurna; Rami Pohja; N. Santamaria; M. Nikolic; D. Blazevic; S. Eremic

doi:10.5281/zenodo.438644

Report on challenges for SCIs: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures Deliverable D2.2

G. Walther, M. Jovanovic, M. Vollmer, G. Desmond, A. Choudhary, Z. Székely, J. Sanne, P. Klimek, D. Bezrukov, Raija Koivisto, Riitta Molarius, I. Macsári, I. Stumphauser, T. Knape, L. Bergfors, K. Buhr, A. Jovanovic, N. Albrecht, S. Warkentin, J. DevarajanK. Tetlak, Pertti Auerkari, Satu Tuurna, Rami Pohja, N. Santamaria, M. Nikolic, D. Blazevic, S. Eremic

Research output: Book/Report › Report

Abstract

The report discusses the challenges posed by four types of threats -terrorist attacks, cyber attacks, extreme weather and social unrest- on the SmartResilience case studies. The way this analysis was conducted was by assessing these threats using a 5x5 framework matrix. The two axes of the matrix were phases (understand risks, anticipate/prepare, absorb/withstand, respond/recover, adapt/learn) and dimensions (system/physical, information/data, organizational/business, societal/political, cognitive/decision-making). Each individual matrix block was discussed by subject experts who identified specific challenges and implications for each matrix element and rated its relevance (high, medium, low). In terms of the results, the system/physical dimension received the highest number of important challenges. Overall, the most important singular element was to understand risks in the organizational/business dimension. The least importance was attributed to the adapt/learn phase.

Original language	English
Publisher	European Commission EC
Number of pages	85
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.438644
Publication status	Published - 2017
MoE publication type	D4 Published development or research report or study

Keywords

smart critical infrastructure
challenge
threat
resilience

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5281/zenodo.438644Licence: CC BY

SmartResilience: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures
Molarius, R. (Participant), Koivisto, R. (Participant), Tuurna, S. (Participant), Auerkari, P. (Participant), Pohja, R. (Participant) & Peltonen, U. (Participant)
1/05/16 → 30/04/19
Project: EU project

Cite this

Walther, G., Jovanovic, M., Vollmer, M., Desmond, G., Choudhary, A., Székely, Z., Sanne, J., Klimek, P., Bezrukov, D., Koivisto, R., Molarius, R., Macsári, I., Stumphauser, I., Knape, T., Bergfors, L., Buhr, K., Jovanovic, A., Albrecht, N., Warkentin, S., ... Eremic, S. (2017). Report on challenges for SCIs: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures Deliverable D2.2. European Commission EC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.438644

@book{b314f49fa1974eb4bdec86a26b266506,

title = "Report on challenges for SCIs: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures Deliverable D2.2",

abstract = "The report discusses the challenges posed by four types of threats -terrorist attacks, cyber attacks, extreme weather and social unrest- on the SmartResilience case studies. The way this analysis was conducted was by assessing these threats using a 5x5 framework matrix. The two axes of the matrix were phases (understand risks, anticipate/prepare, absorb/withstand, respond/recover, adapt/learn) and dimensions (system/physical, information/data, organizational/business, societal/political, cognitive/decision-making). Each individual matrix block was discussed by subject experts who identified specific challenges and implications for each matrix element and rated its relevance (high, medium, low). In terms of the results, the system/physical dimension received the highest number of important challenges. Overall, the most important singular element was to understand risks in the organizational/business dimension. The least importance was attributed to the adapt/learn phase.",

keywords = "smart critical infrastructure, challenge, threat, resilience",

author = "G. Walther and M. Jovanovic and M. Vollmer and G. Desmond and A. Choudhary and Z. Sz{\'e}kely and J. Sanne and P. Klimek and D. Bezrukov and Raija Koivisto and Riitta Molarius and I. Macs{\'a}ri and I. Stumphauser and T. Knape and L. Bergfors and K. Buhr and A. Jovanovic and N. Albrecht and S. Warkentin and J. Devarajan and K. Tetlak and Pertti Auerkari and Satu Tuurna and Rami Pohja and N. Santamaria and M. Nikolic and D. Blazevic and S. Eremic",

note = "HUO: H2020-Secure societies - Protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens; 700621; SmartResilience Project code: 107172 ",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.5281/zenodo.438644",

language = "English",

publisher = "European Commission EC",

address = "Belgium",

}

Walther, G, Jovanovic, M, Vollmer, M, Desmond, G, Choudhary, A, Székely, Z, Sanne, J, Klimek, P, Bezrukov, D, Koivisto, R, Molarius, R, Macsári, I, Stumphauser, I, Knape, T, Bergfors, L, Buhr, K, Jovanovic, A, Albrecht, N, Warkentin, S, Devarajan, J, Tetlak, K, Auerkari, P, Tuurna, S, Pohja, R, Santamaria, N, Nikolic, M, Blazevic, D & Eremic, S 2017, Report on challenges for SCIs: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures Deliverable D2.2. European Commission EC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.438644

TY - BOOK

T1 - Report on challenges for SCIs

T2 - Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures Deliverable D2.2

AU - Walther, G.

AU - Jovanovic, M.

AU - Vollmer, M.

AU - Desmond, G.

AU - Choudhary, A.

AU - Székely, Z.

AU - Sanne, J.

AU - Klimek, P.

AU - Bezrukov, D.

AU - Koivisto, Raija

AU - Molarius, Riitta

AU - Macsári, I.

AU - Stumphauser, I.

AU - Knape, T.

AU - Bergfors, L.

AU - Buhr, K.

AU - Jovanovic, A.

AU - Albrecht, N.

AU - Warkentin, S.

AU - Devarajan, J.

AU - Tetlak, K.

AU - Auerkari, Pertti

AU - Tuurna, Satu

AU - Pohja, Rami

AU - Santamaria, N.

AU - Nikolic, M.

AU - Blazevic, D.

AU - Eremic, S.

N1 - HUO: H2020-Secure societies - Protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens; 700621; SmartResilience Project code: 107172

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The report discusses the challenges posed by four types of threats -terrorist attacks, cyber attacks, extreme weather and social unrest- on the SmartResilience case studies. The way this analysis was conducted was by assessing these threats using a 5x5 framework matrix. The two axes of the matrix were phases (understand risks, anticipate/prepare, absorb/withstand, respond/recover, adapt/learn) and dimensions (system/physical, information/data, organizational/business, societal/political, cognitive/decision-making). Each individual matrix block was discussed by subject experts who identified specific challenges and implications for each matrix element and rated its relevance (high, medium, low). In terms of the results, the system/physical dimension received the highest number of important challenges. Overall, the most important singular element was to understand risks in the organizational/business dimension. The least importance was attributed to the adapt/learn phase.

AB - The report discusses the challenges posed by four types of threats -terrorist attacks, cyber attacks, extreme weather and social unrest- on the SmartResilience case studies. The way this analysis was conducted was by assessing these threats using a 5x5 framework matrix. The two axes of the matrix were phases (understand risks, anticipate/prepare, absorb/withstand, respond/recover, adapt/learn) and dimensions (system/physical, information/data, organizational/business, societal/political, cognitive/decision-making). Each individual matrix block was discussed by subject experts who identified specific challenges and implications for each matrix element and rated its relevance (high, medium, low). In terms of the results, the system/physical dimension received the highest number of important challenges. Overall, the most important singular element was to understand risks in the organizational/business dimension. The least importance was attributed to the adapt/learn phase.

KW - smart critical infrastructure

KW - challenge

KW - threat

KW - resilience

U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.438644

DO - 10.5281/zenodo.438644

M3 - Report

BT - Report on challenges for SCIs

PB - European Commission EC

ER -

Report on challenges for SCIs: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures Deliverable D2.2

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

SmartResilience: Smart Resilience Indicators for Smart Critical Infrastructures

Cite this