Resilience through interpretive practice: A study of robotic surgery

Mikael Wahlström (Corresponding Author), Laura Seppänen, Leena Norros, Iina Aaltonen, Jarno Riikonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-128
Number of pages16
JournalSafety Science
Volume108
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Robotics
surgery
resilience
video
spontaneity
Palpation
Touch
Uncertainty
Navigation
damages
cancer
Health
uncertainty
Interviews
Tissue
Feedback
Safety
Planning
planning
interaction

Keywords

  • Cancer treatment
  • Field study
  • Resilience
  • Robotic surgery
  • Situational demands
  • Work practices

Cite this

Wahlström, Mikael ; Seppänen, Laura ; Norros, Leena ; Aaltonen, Iina ; Riikonen, Jarno. / Resilience through interpretive practice : A study of robotic surgery. In: Safety Science. 2018 ; Vol. 108. pp. 113-128.
@article{d7ce51af992948548989e557c69a128c,
title = "Resilience through interpretive practice: A study of robotic surgery",
abstract = "The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.",
keywords = "Cancer treatment, Field study, Resilience, Robotic surgery, Situational demands, Work practices",
author = "Mikael Wahlstr{\"o}m and Laura Sepp{\"a}nen and Leena Norros and Iina Aaltonen and Jarno Riikonen",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.010",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "113--128",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Resilience through interpretive practice : A study of robotic surgery. / Wahlström, Mikael (Corresponding Author); Seppänen, Laura; Norros, Leena; Aaltonen, Iina; Riikonen, Jarno.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 108, 01.10.2018, p. 113-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience through interpretive practice

T2 - A study of robotic surgery

AU - Wahlström, Mikael

AU - Seppänen, Laura

AU - Norros, Leena

AU - Aaltonen, Iina

AU - Riikonen, Jarno

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.

AB - The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.

KW - Cancer treatment

KW - Field study

KW - Resilience

KW - Robotic surgery

KW - Situational demands

KW - Work practices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046646032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046646032

VL - 108

SP - 113

EP - 128

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

ER -