Resilience through interpretive practice: A study of robotic surgery

Mikael Wahlström (Corresponding Author), Laura Seppänen, Leena Norros, Iina Aaltonen, Jarno Riikonen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)113-128
    Number of pages16
    JournalSafety Science
    Volume108
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Robotics
    surgery
    resilience
    video
    spontaneity
    Palpation
    Touch
    Uncertainty
    Navigation
    damages
    cancer
    Health
    uncertainty
    Interviews
    Tissue
    Feedback
    Safety
    Planning
    planning
    interaction

    Keywords

    • Cancer treatment
    • Field study
    • Resilience
    • Robotic surgery
    • Situational demands
    • Work practices

    Cite this

    Wahlström, Mikael ; Seppänen, Laura ; Norros, Leena ; Aaltonen, Iina ; Riikonen, Jarno. / Resilience through interpretive practice : A study of robotic surgery. In: Safety Science. 2018 ; Vol. 108. pp. 113-128.
    @article{d7ce51af992948548989e557c69a128c,
    title = "Resilience through interpretive practice: A study of robotic surgery",
    abstract = "The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.",
    keywords = "Cancer treatment, Field study, Resilience, Robotic surgery, Situational demands, Work practices",
    author = "Mikael Wahlstr{\"o}m and Laura Sepp{\"a}nen and Leena Norros and Iina Aaltonen and Jarno Riikonen",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.010",
    language = "English",
    volume = "108",
    pages = "113--128",
    journal = "Safety Science",
    issn = "0925-7535",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Resilience through interpretive practice : A study of robotic surgery. / Wahlström, Mikael (Corresponding Author); Seppänen, Laura; Norros, Leena; Aaltonen, Iina; Riikonen, Jarno.

    In: Safety Science, Vol. 108, 01.10.2018, p. 113-128.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Resilience through interpretive practice

    T2 - A study of robotic surgery

    AU - Wahlström, Mikael

    AU - Seppänen, Laura

    AU - Norros, Leena

    AU - Aaltonen, Iina

    AU - Riikonen, Jarno

    PY - 2018/10/1

    Y1 - 2018/10/1

    N2 - The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.

    AB - The paper provides an ethnographic description of robotic surgery, along with task and work-domain analyses of it, with focus on surgeons’ adaptation to situational demands. Thereby, the study conducted ties in with the discussions on resilience and interpretive practice, theoretical approaches that consider human capability and improvisation in activity as sources of safety. The study methods include observations of operations, video analyses, interviews and self-confrontation sessions (i.e., surgeons commenting on video samples of their own work). The results are summarised in a conceptual model encompassing the basic elements that enable robotic surgery as an activity: manual, perceptual, social, and cognitive aspects are covered at three hierarchical levels, from strategies and planning to routinised techniques. Uncertainties and complexities that render adaptation challenging are elaborated upon. Robotic surgery could be considered a complex form of navigation since where anticipatory interaction with the environment is needed – the surgeon creates the landscape where the operation takes place, and tissues are identified and separated by palpation, albeit without tactile feedback, and with careful consideration of the patient's health. In this challenging environment conflictual aims are to be addressed: minimal damage should be induced while one removes the cancer. The findings suggest that resilient activity is manifested in an interpretive human–environment connection wherein appropriate generic principles and aims guide more specific work actions; a hierarchy in adaptation to situational demands can therefore be identified as the specific actions, usually based on relatively fixed routines, vary and adapt in line with higher-level principles.

    KW - Cancer treatment

    KW - Field study

    KW - Resilience

    KW - Robotic surgery

    KW - Situational demands

    KW - Work practices

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046646032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.010

    DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.010

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85046646032

    VL - 108

    SP - 113

    EP - 128

    JO - Safety Science

    JF - Safety Science

    SN - 0925-7535

    ER -