Abstract
Control centers in large-scale events entail heterogeneous combinations
of off-the-shelf and proprietary systems built into ordinary rooms, and
in this respect they place themselves in an interesting contrast to more
permanent control rooms with custom-made systems and a large number of
operational procedures. In this article we ask how it is possible for a
control center that is seemingly so “ad hoc” in nature to achieve a
remarkable safety level in the face of many safety-critical incidents.
We present analyses of data collected in two FIA World Rally
Championships events. The results highlight three aspects of the
workers' practices: (a) the practice of making use of redundancy in
technologically mediated representations, (b) the practice of updating
the intersubjective understanding of the incident status through verbal
coordination, and (c) the practice of reacting immediately to emergency
messages even without a comprehensive view of the situation, and
gradually iterating one's hypothesis to correct the action. This type of
collaborative setting imposes special demands to support the practices
of absorbing, translating, and manipulating incoming information.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 9-37 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Human-Computer Interaction |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |