Results of the IEA round robin on viscosity and stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils

Douglas C. Elliott, Anja Oasmaa, Fernando Preto, Dietrich Meier, Anthony V. Bridgwater

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An international round robin study of the stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oil was undertaken. Fifteen laboratories in five different countries contributed. Two bio-oil samples were distributed to the laboratories for stability testing and further analysis. The stability test was defined in a method provided with the bio-oil samples. Viscosity measurement was a key input. The change in viscosity of a sealed sample of bio-oil held for 24 h at 80 °C was the defining element of stability. Subsequent analyses included ultimate analysis, density, moisture, ash, filterable solids, and TAN/pH determination, and gel permeation chromatography. The results showed that kinematic viscosity measurement was more generally conducted and more reproducibly performed versus dynamic viscosity measurement. The variation in the results of the stability test was great and a number of reasons for the variation were identified. The subsequent analyses proved to be at the level of reproducibility, as found in earlier round robins on bio-oil analysis. Clearly, the analyses were more straightforward and reproducible with a bio-oil sample low in filterable solids (0.2%), compared to one with a higher (2%) solids loading. These results can be helpful in setting standards for use of bio-oil, which is just coming into the marketplace.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3769-3776
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy & Fuels
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2012
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Oils
Pyrolysis
Viscosity
Viscosity measurement
Ashes
Triacetoneamine-N-Oxyl
Gel permeation chromatography
Moisture
Testing

Cite this

Elliott, Douglas C. ; Oasmaa, Anja ; Preto, Fernando ; Meier, Dietrich ; Bridgwater, Anthony V. / Results of the IEA round robin on viscosity and stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils. In: Energy & Fuels. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 3769-3776.
@article{76e83262cdb54cc2a9104e8087fc8b47,
title = "Results of the IEA round robin on viscosity and stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils",
abstract = "An international round robin study of the stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oil was undertaken. Fifteen laboratories in five different countries contributed. Two bio-oil samples were distributed to the laboratories for stability testing and further analysis. The stability test was defined in a method provided with the bio-oil samples. Viscosity measurement was a key input. The change in viscosity of a sealed sample of bio-oil held for 24 h at 80 °C was the defining element of stability. Subsequent analyses included ultimate analysis, density, moisture, ash, filterable solids, and TAN/pH determination, and gel permeation chromatography. The results showed that kinematic viscosity measurement was more generally conducted and more reproducibly performed versus dynamic viscosity measurement. The variation in the results of the stability test was great and a number of reasons for the variation were identified. The subsequent analyses proved to be at the level of reproducibility, as found in earlier round robins on bio-oil analysis. Clearly, the analyses were more straightforward and reproducible with a bio-oil sample low in filterable solids (0.2{\%}), compared to one with a higher (2{\%}) solids loading. These results can be helpful in setting standards for use of bio-oil, which is just coming into the marketplace.",
author = "Elliott, {Douglas C.} and Anja Oasmaa and Fernando Preto and Dietrich Meier and Bridgwater, {Anthony V.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1021/ef300384t",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "3769--3776",
journal = "Energy & Fuels",
issn = "0887-0624",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "6",

}

Results of the IEA round robin on viscosity and stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils. / Elliott, Douglas C.; Oasmaa, Anja; Preto, Fernando; Meier, Dietrich; Bridgwater, Anthony V.

In: Energy & Fuels, Vol. 26, No. 6, 21.06.2012, p. 3769-3776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of the IEA round robin on viscosity and stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils

AU - Elliott, Douglas C.

AU - Oasmaa, Anja

AU - Preto, Fernando

AU - Meier, Dietrich

AU - Bridgwater, Anthony V.

PY - 2012/6/21

Y1 - 2012/6/21

N2 - An international round robin study of the stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oil was undertaken. Fifteen laboratories in five different countries contributed. Two bio-oil samples were distributed to the laboratories for stability testing and further analysis. The stability test was defined in a method provided with the bio-oil samples. Viscosity measurement was a key input. The change in viscosity of a sealed sample of bio-oil held for 24 h at 80 °C was the defining element of stability. Subsequent analyses included ultimate analysis, density, moisture, ash, filterable solids, and TAN/pH determination, and gel permeation chromatography. The results showed that kinematic viscosity measurement was more generally conducted and more reproducibly performed versus dynamic viscosity measurement. The variation in the results of the stability test was great and a number of reasons for the variation were identified. The subsequent analyses proved to be at the level of reproducibility, as found in earlier round robins on bio-oil analysis. Clearly, the analyses were more straightforward and reproducible with a bio-oil sample low in filterable solids (0.2%), compared to one with a higher (2%) solids loading. These results can be helpful in setting standards for use of bio-oil, which is just coming into the marketplace.

AB - An international round robin study of the stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oil was undertaken. Fifteen laboratories in five different countries contributed. Two bio-oil samples were distributed to the laboratories for stability testing and further analysis. The stability test was defined in a method provided with the bio-oil samples. Viscosity measurement was a key input. The change in viscosity of a sealed sample of bio-oil held for 24 h at 80 °C was the defining element of stability. Subsequent analyses included ultimate analysis, density, moisture, ash, filterable solids, and TAN/pH determination, and gel permeation chromatography. The results showed that kinematic viscosity measurement was more generally conducted and more reproducibly performed versus dynamic viscosity measurement. The variation in the results of the stability test was great and a number of reasons for the variation were identified. The subsequent analyses proved to be at the level of reproducibility, as found in earlier round robins on bio-oil analysis. Clearly, the analyses were more straightforward and reproducible with a bio-oil sample low in filterable solids (0.2%), compared to one with a higher (2%) solids loading. These results can be helpful in setting standards for use of bio-oil, which is just coming into the marketplace.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862645350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ef300384t

DO - 10.1021/ef300384t

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 3769

EP - 3776

JO - Energy & Fuels

JF - Energy & Fuels

SN - 0887-0624

IS - 6

ER -