TY - GEN
T1 - Risk and resilience
T2 - BALTICA X - International Conference on Life Management and Maintenance for Power Plants
AU - Jovanovic, A.
AU - Auerkari, Pertti
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The paper highlights the practical aspects of new EU
project SmartResilience and its application in Finland.
The basic idea of the project is that modern critical
infrastructures are becoming increasingly "smarter" (e.g.
cities). Making the infrastructures "smarter" usually
means making them smarter in normal operation and use,
but it has to be checked if these smart critical
infrastructures (SCIs) will behave equally "smartly" and
be "smartly resilient" also when exposed to extreme
threats, such as extreme weather disasters or, e.g.,
terrorist attacks. Similarly, the question is, if making
existing infrastructure "smarter" is achieved by making
it more complex, would it also make it more vulnerable?
Would this affect resilience of an SCI as its ability to
anticipate, prepare for, adapt and withstand, respond to,
and recover? These questions are tackled by the project,
which plans answer these questions in several steps: by
(#1) identifying existing indicators suitable for
assessing resilience of SCIs; (#2) identifying new
"smart" resilience indicators (RIs) - including those
from Big Data; (#3) developing a new advanced resilience
assessment methodology based on smart RIs ("resilience
indicators cube", including the resilience matrix); (#4)
developing the interactive "SCI Dashboard" tool; and (#5)
applying the methodology/tools in eight case studies,
integrated under one virtual, smart-city-like, European
case study. One of these case studies will take place in
Finland, dealing with modern systems of energy supply.
AB - The paper highlights the practical aspects of new EU
project SmartResilience and its application in Finland.
The basic idea of the project is that modern critical
infrastructures are becoming increasingly "smarter" (e.g.
cities). Making the infrastructures "smarter" usually
means making them smarter in normal operation and use,
but it has to be checked if these smart critical
infrastructures (SCIs) will behave equally "smartly" and
be "smartly resilient" also when exposed to extreme
threats, such as extreme weather disasters or, e.g.,
terrorist attacks. Similarly, the question is, if making
existing infrastructure "smarter" is achieved by making
it more complex, would it also make it more vulnerable?
Would this affect resilience of an SCI as its ability to
anticipate, prepare for, adapt and withstand, respond to,
and recover? These questions are tackled by the project,
which plans answer these questions in several steps: by
(#1) identifying existing indicators suitable for
assessing resilience of SCIs; (#2) identifying new
"smart" resilience indicators (RIs) - including those
from Big Data; (#3) developing a new advanced resilience
assessment methodology based on smart RIs ("resilience
indicators cube", including the resilience matrix); (#4)
developing the interactive "SCI Dashboard" tool; and (#5)
applying the methodology/tools in eight case studies,
integrated under one virtual, smart-city-like, European
case study. One of these case studies will take place in
Finland, dealing with modern systems of energy supply.
M3 - Conference article in proceedings
T3 - VTT Technology
BT - Baltica X
A2 - Auerkari, Pertti
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
CY - Espoo
Y2 - 7 June 2016 through 9 June 2016
ER -