Robust whole-brain segmentation: Application to traumatic brain injury

Christian Ledig (Corresponding Author), Rolf A. Heckemann, Alexander Hammers, Juan Carlos Lopez, Virginia F.J. Newcombe, Antonios Makropoulos, Jyrki Lötjönen, David K. Menon, Daniel Rueckert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a framework for the robust and fully-automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) brain images called "Multi-Atlas Label Propagation with Expectation-Maximisation based refinement" (MALP-EM). The presented approach is based on a robust registration approach (MAPER), highly performant label fusion (joint label fusion) and intensity-based label refinement using EM. We further adapt this framework to be applicable for the segmentation of brain images with gross changes in anatomy. We propose to account for consistent registration errors by relaxing anatomical priors obtained by multi-atlas propagation and a weighting scheme to locally combine anatomical atlas priors and intensity-refined posterior probabilities. The method is evaluated on a benchmark dataset used in a recent MICCAI segmentation challenge. In this context we show that MALP-EM is competitive for the segmentation of MR brain scans of healthy adults when compared to state-of-the-art automatic labelling techniques. To demonstrate the versatility of the proposed approach, we employed MALP-EM to segment 125 MR brain images into 134 regions from subjects who had sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI). We employ a protocol to assess segmentation quality if no manual reference labels are available. Based on this protocol, three independent, blinded raters confirmed on 13 MR brain scans with pathology that MALP-EM is superior to established label fusion techniques. We visually confirm the robustness of our segmentation approach on the full cohort and investigate the potential of derived symmetry-based imaging biomarkers that correlate with and predict clinically relevant variables in TBI such as the Marshall Classification (MC) or Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). Specifically, we show that we are able to stratify TBI patients with favourable outcomes from non-favourable outcomes with 64.7% accuracy using acute-phase MR images and 66.8% accuracy using follow-up MR images. Furthermore, we are able to differentiate subjects with the presence of a mass lesion or midline shift from those with diffuse brain injury with 76.0% accuracy. The thalamus, putamen, pallidum and hippocampus are particularly affected. Their involvement predicts TBI disease progression.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-58
JournalMedical Image Analysis
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Multiatlas segmentation
  • Brain image segmentation
  • Expectation–maximisation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Robust whole-brain segmentation: Application to traumatic brain injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Ledig, C., Heckemann, R. A., Hammers, A., Lopez, J. C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Makropoulos, A., Lötjönen, J., Menon, D. K., & Rueckert, D. (2015). Robust whole-brain segmentation: Application to traumatic brain injury. Medical Image Analysis, 21(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2014.12.003