Robustness of climate metrics under climate policy ambiguity

Tommi Ekholm (Corresponding Author), Tomi J. Lindroos, Ilkka Savolainen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)


    A wide array of alternatives has been proposed as the common metrics with which to compare the climate impacts of different emission types. Different physical and economic metrics and their parameterizations give diverse weights between e.g. CH4 and CO2, and fixing the metric from one perspective makes it sub-optimal from another. As the aims of global climate policy involve some degree of ambiguity, it is not possible to determine a metric that would be optimal and consistent with all policy aims. This paper evaluates the cost implications of using predetermined metrics in cost-efficient mitigation scenarios. Three formulations of the 2 °C target, including both deterministic and stochastic approaches, shared a wide range of metric values for CH4 with which the mitigation costs are only slightly above the cost-optimal levels. Therefore, although ambiguity in current policy might prevent us from selecting an optimal metric, it can be possible to select robust metric values that perform well with multiple policy targets.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)44-52
    JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed


    • climate economics
    • climate metric
    • climate policy


    Dive into the research topics of 'Robustness of climate metrics under climate policy ambiguity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this