Round robin performance testing of organic photovoltaic devices

S.A. Gevorgyan (Corresponding Author), O. Zubillaga, J.M.V. de Seoane, M. Machado, E.A. Parlak, N. Tore, E. Voroshazi, T. Aernouts, H. Müllejans, G. Bardizza, N. Taylor, W. Verhees, J.M. Kroon, P. Morvillo, C. Minarini, F. Roca, F.A. Castro, S. Cros, B. Lechêne, J.F. TrigoC. Guillén, J. Herrero, B. Zimmermann, S.B. Sapkota, C. Veit, U. Würfel, P.S. Tuladhar, J.R. Durrant, S. Winter, Sanna Rousu, Marja Välimäki, V. Hinrichs, S.R. Cowan, D.C. Olson, P. Sommer-Larsen, F.C. Krebs

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study addresses the issue of poor intercomparability of measurements of organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices among different laboratories. We present a round robin performance testing of novel OPV devices among 16 laboratories, organized within the framework of European Research Infrastructure Project (SOPHIA) and European Energy Research Alliance (EERA). Three types of OPVs with different structures, dimensions and encapsulations are studied and compared with reference Si solar cells certified by accredited laboratories. The agreement of the measurements of these among different laboratories is analyzed by focusing on testing procedures, testing equipment and sample designs. A number of deviations and pitfalls are revealed and based on the analyses, a set of recommendations are suggested for improving the agreement among the measurements of such OPV technologies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)376-387
    Number of pages12
    JournalRenewable Energy
    Volume63
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Keywords

    • I-V characterization
    • intercomparability
    • organic photovoltaic
    • round robin
    • standard testing conditions

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Round robin performance testing of organic photovoltaic devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this