Safe-and-sustainable-by-design: State of the art approaches and lessons learned from value chain perspectives

Christina Apel; Klaus Kümmerer; Akshat Sudheshwar; Bernd Nowack; Claudia Som; Catherine Colin; Lutz Walter; Johan Breukelaar; Marcel Meeus; Beatriz Ildefonso; Dmitri Petrovykh; Chaima Elyahmadi; Elina Huttunen-Saarivirta; Ann Dierckx; Anne Chloé Devic; Eva Valsami-Jones; Maurice Brennan; Cris Rocca; Johanna Scheper; Emma Strömberg; Lya G. Soeteman-Hernández

doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876

Safe-and-sustainable-by-design: State of the art approaches and lessons learned from value chain perspectives

Christina Apel, Klaus Kümmerer, Akshat Sudheshwar, Bernd Nowack, Claudia Som, Catherine Colin, Lutz Walter, Johan Breukelaar, Marcel Meeus, Beatriz Ildefonso, Dmitri Petrovykh, Chaima Elyahmadi, Elina Huttunen-Saarivirta, Ann Dierckx, Anne Chloé Devic, Eva Valsami-Jones, Maurice Brennan, Cris Rocca, Johanna Scheper, Emma StrömbergLya G. Soeteman-Hernández

BA55 Knowledge driven design

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) is central in the European Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, yet a common understanding of what SSbD is in concept and in practice is still needed. A comparison of current SSbD descriptions and approaches was made and lessons learned were derived from value chain discussions (packaging, textile, construction, automotive, energy materials, electronics, and fragrances value chains) to help provide input on how to implement SSbD in practice. Five important building blocks were identified: design, data, risk and sustainability governance, competencies, and social and corporate strategic needs. Other lessons learned include the identification of the biggest safety and sustainability challenges in a lifecycle-thinking approach towards the development of purpose-driven innovations, and connecting trans-disciplinary experts to the innovation process, already from the early phases. A clear understanding of what SSbD is and how to implement the SSbD framework is needed with clear procedures and incentives to support the industrial sector, especially SMEs.

Original language	English
Article number	100876
Journal	Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry
Volume	45
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876
Publication status	Published - Feb 2024
MoE publication type	A2 Review article in a scientific journal

Funding

IRISS receives funding from the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement no 101058245. UK participants in Project IRISS are supported by UKRI grant 10038816. CH participants in Project IRISS receive funding from the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation ( SERI ). Recent policy developments such as the European Green Deal [1], the European Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (EC-CSS) [2] and the Zero Pollution Action Plan [3] aim to support the transition towards climate neutrality and a toxic-free environment. To achieve this transition, making chemicals, materials, products, and processes safer and more sustainable by design is fundamental and both a societal urgency and a great economic opportunity for the European manufacturing industry to regain competitiveness [2].Currently, the education sector is a further source of potential inertia for SSbD as specific university curricula as well as training courses for professionals are lacking. The integration of SSbD in education is a key element to support the development and implementation of SSbD across industrial sectors [9,11] and one ‘enabling condition’ listed by the EEA [9]. Both current and future workforces need to be equipped with the necessary skill profile to incorporate safety and sustainability aspects into the product design along the whole lifecycle. This includes students of, e.g., engineering, product design, and chemistry as well as all key people in the design process, including product engineers, plant managers, chemists, sustainability experts, and decision-makers throughout the product's supply chain [9]. To enable a life-long learning, which is an important aspect mentioned in the 1st principle of the European Pillar of Social Rights [52], diverse re- and up-skilling opportunities are required. Technical support centres [9] or the Pact for Skills [52] could support the realisation of such trainings. Additionally, societal education is needed for different stakeholders, including consumers [9,53].The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Lya G. Soeteman-Hernandez reports financial support was provided by European Commission. A co-author Prof. Dr. Klaus Kümmerer is an editor in Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. IRISS receives funding from the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement no 101058245. UK participants in Project IRISS are supported by UKRI grant 10038816. CH participants in Project IRISS receive funding from the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI).

Keywords

By-design
Innovation process
Lifecycle
Safety and sustainability
SSbD concept
Value chain perspective

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876Licence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

Apel, C., Kümmerer, K., Sudheshwar, A., Nowack, B., Som, C., Colin, C., Walter, L., Breukelaar, J., Meeus, M., Ildefonso, B., Petrovykh, D., Elyahmadi, C., Huttunen-Saarivirta, E., Dierckx, A., Devic, A. C., Valsami-Jones, E., Brennan, M., Rocca, C., Scheper, J., ... Soeteman-Hernández, L. G. (2024). Safe-and-sustainable-by-design: State of the art approaches and lessons learned from value chain perspectives. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 45, Article 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876

@article{22da4e2732c14c359e32f07389c88cbb,

title = "Safe-and-sustainable-by-design: State of the art approaches and lessons learned from value chain perspectives",

abstract = "Safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) is central in the European Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, yet a common understanding of what SSbD is in concept and in practice is still needed. A comparison of current SSbD descriptions and approaches was made and lessons learned were derived from value chain discussions (packaging, textile, construction, automotive, energy materials, electronics, and fragrances value chains) to help provide input on how to implement SSbD in practice. Five important building blocks were identified: design, data, risk and sustainability governance, competencies, and social and corporate strategic needs. Other lessons learned include the identification of the biggest safety and sustainability challenges in a lifecycle-thinking approach towards the development of purpose-driven innovations, and connecting trans-disciplinary experts to the innovation process, already from the early phases. A clear understanding of what SSbD is and how to implement the SSbD framework is needed with clear procedures and incentives to support the industrial sector, especially SMEs.",

keywords = "By-design, Innovation process, Lifecycle, Safety and sustainability, SSbD concept, Value chain perspective",

author = "Christina Apel and Klaus K{\"u}mmerer and Akshat Sudheshwar and Bernd Nowack and Claudia Som and Catherine Colin and Lutz Walter and Johan Breukelaar and Marcel Meeus and Beatriz Ildefonso and Dmitri Petrovykh and Chaima Elyahmadi and Elina Huttunen-Saarivirta and Ann Dierckx and Devic, {Anne Chlo{\'e}} and Eva Valsami-Jones and Maurice Brennan and Cris Rocca and Johanna Scheper and Emma Str{\"o}mberg and Soeteman-Hern{\'a}ndez, {Lya G.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors",

year = "2024",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

journal = "Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry",

issn = "2452-2236",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Apel, C, Kümmerer, K, Sudheshwar, A, Nowack, B, Som, C, Colin, C, Walter, L, Breukelaar, J, Meeus, M, Ildefonso, B, Petrovykh, D, Elyahmadi, C, Huttunen-Saarivirta, E, Dierckx, A, Devic, AC, Valsami-Jones, E, Brennan, M, Rocca, C, Scheper, J, Strömberg, E & Soeteman-Hernández, LG 2024, 'Safe-and-sustainable-by-design: State of the art approaches and lessons learned from value chain perspectives', Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, vol. 45, 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safe-and-sustainable-by-design

T2 - State of the art approaches and lessons learned from value chain perspectives

AU - Apel, Christina

AU - Kümmerer, Klaus

AU - Sudheshwar, Akshat

AU - Nowack, Bernd

AU - Som, Claudia

AU - Colin, Catherine

AU - Walter, Lutz

AU - Breukelaar, Johan

AU - Meeus, Marcel

AU - Ildefonso, Beatriz

AU - Petrovykh, Dmitri

AU - Elyahmadi, Chaima

AU - Huttunen-Saarivirta, Elina

AU - Dierckx, Ann

AU - Devic, Anne Chloé

AU - Valsami-Jones, Eva

AU - Brennan, Maurice

AU - Rocca, Cris

AU - Scheper, Johanna

AU - Strömberg, Emma

AU - Soeteman-Hernández, Lya G.

PY - 2024/2

Y1 - 2024/2

N2 - Safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) is central in the European Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, yet a common understanding of what SSbD is in concept and in practice is still needed. A comparison of current SSbD descriptions and approaches was made and lessons learned were derived from value chain discussions (packaging, textile, construction, automotive, energy materials, electronics, and fragrances value chains) to help provide input on how to implement SSbD in practice. Five important building blocks were identified: design, data, risk and sustainability governance, competencies, and social and corporate strategic needs. Other lessons learned include the identification of the biggest safety and sustainability challenges in a lifecycle-thinking approach towards the development of purpose-driven innovations, and connecting trans-disciplinary experts to the innovation process, already from the early phases. A clear understanding of what SSbD is and how to implement the SSbD framework is needed with clear procedures and incentives to support the industrial sector, especially SMEs.

AB - Safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) is central in the European Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, yet a common understanding of what SSbD is in concept and in practice is still needed. A comparison of current SSbD descriptions and approaches was made and lessons learned were derived from value chain discussions (packaging, textile, construction, automotive, energy materials, electronics, and fragrances value chains) to help provide input on how to implement SSbD in practice. Five important building blocks were identified: design, data, risk and sustainability governance, competencies, and social and corporate strategic needs. Other lessons learned include the identification of the biggest safety and sustainability challenges in a lifecycle-thinking approach towards the development of purpose-driven innovations, and connecting trans-disciplinary experts to the innovation process, already from the early phases. A clear understanding of what SSbD is and how to implement the SSbD framework is needed with clear procedures and incentives to support the industrial sector, especially SMEs.

KW - By-design

KW - Innovation process

KW - Lifecycle

KW - Safety and sustainability

KW - SSbD concept

KW - Value chain perspective

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179896471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876

DO - 10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100876

M3 - Review Article

AN - SCOPUS:85179896471

SN - 2452-2236

VL - 45

JO - Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry

JF - Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry

M1 - 100876

ER -

Safe-and-sustainable-by-design: State of the art approaches and lessons learned from value chain perspectives

Abstract

Funding

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this