Safety-conscious process design: Dissertation

    Research output: ThesisDissertationCollection of Articles

    Abstract

    Safety is one of the most important features of modern chemical processes. The foundation for the safety of a process is formed when designing the process. It is common practice to analyse the process with regard to safety during or at least at the end of the design. Accident and incident data together with other experiences, however, suggest that a considerable portion of process accidents and incidents are ultimately due to inadequate design. Based on the literature, this study strives first to identify the deficiencies and problems in current process design practice. Three common practices to address safety have been studied: adherence to good practice, safety analyses and inherently safer design. The problems in their use include the deficient coverage of the problem area and the analytic (not synthesizing) way to consider safety which often is too late because the important safety-related decisions have been made already. With regard to inherently safer design, there are no good tools available. To sum up, safety is not being taken continuously and systematically into consideration during process design. This study suggests a new process design approach, Safety-conscious process design methodology, which strives to raise the designer's safety-consciousness of the process to a level surpassing that of the current descriptive-analytical approach (i.e. safety is the result of the design decisions and can be analysed), the outcome being a prescriptive-synthetical approach (awareness of what the process safety should be after some design decision). Safety-conscious process design methodology is built on Phenomenon-driven process design methodology and Performance-driven design strategy. Safety has been defined in the same object hierarchy as 'process', thus including safety in the description of process and process design (in object form). This association makes safety considerations systematic and continuous during the process design. A new concept, safety balance, was developed to aid the safety assessment during the process design. Safety balance also offers a means of assessing the safety-consciousness of a design decision. The novel advantage of safety balance (when compared to current practices) is that balance control volume must be defined, i.e. the area or extent included in the safety consideration must be defined and this has not been self evident previously. Safety-conscious process design methodology still suffers from some deficiencies, such as the quantification of safety and the definition of aggregation operators which enable the safety assessment of the entire process based on the safety values of its parts. The Safety-conscious process design approach was tested in one industrial design case. The results were promising, even without proper tools for knowledge handling and safety assessment.
    Original languageEnglish
    QualificationDoctor Degree
    Awarding Institution
    • University of Oulu
    Supervisors/Advisors
    • Pohjola, Veikko, Advisor, External person
    • Suokas, Jouko, Supervisor, External person
    Award date16 Feb 1996
    Place of PublicationEspoo
    Publisher
    Print ISBNs951-38-4922-8
    Publication statusPublished - 1996
    MoE publication typeG5 Doctoral dissertation (article)

    Fingerprint

    Process design
    Accidents

    Keywords

    • safety
    • safety engineering
    • design
    • design methodology
    • analyzing
    • evaluation
    • safety-consciousness
    • accidents
    • models
    • chemical industry

    Cite this

    Koivisto, R. (1996). Safety-conscious process design: Dissertation. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
    Koivisto, Raija. / Safety-conscious process design : Dissertation. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1996. 156 p.
    @phdthesis{e01927b6b40840e1aa6efd1d30314027,
    title = "Safety-conscious process design: Dissertation",
    abstract = "Safety is one of the most important features of modern chemical processes. The foundation for the safety of a process is formed when designing the process. It is common practice to analyse the process with regard to safety during or at least at the end of the design. Accident and incident data together with other experiences, however, suggest that a considerable portion of process accidents and incidents are ultimately due to inadequate design. Based on the literature, this study strives first to identify the deficiencies and problems in current process design practice. Three common practices to address safety have been studied: adherence to good practice, safety analyses and inherently safer design. The problems in their use include the deficient coverage of the problem area and the analytic (not synthesizing) way to consider safety which often is too late because the important safety-related decisions have been made already. With regard to inherently safer design, there are no good tools available. To sum up, safety is not being taken continuously and systematically into consideration during process design. This study suggests a new process design approach, Safety-conscious process design methodology, which strives to raise the designer's safety-consciousness of the process to a level surpassing that of the current descriptive-analytical approach (i.e. safety is the result of the design decisions and can be analysed), the outcome being a prescriptive-synthetical approach (awareness of what the process safety should be after some design decision). Safety-conscious process design methodology is built on Phenomenon-driven process design methodology and Performance-driven design strategy. Safety has been defined in the same object hierarchy as 'process', thus including safety in the description of process and process design (in object form). This association makes safety considerations systematic and continuous during the process design. A new concept, safety balance, was developed to aid the safety assessment during the process design. Safety balance also offers a means of assessing the safety-consciousness of a design decision. The novel advantage of safety balance (when compared to current practices) is that balance control volume must be defined, i.e. the area or extent included in the safety consideration must be defined and this has not been self evident previously. Safety-conscious process design methodology still suffers from some deficiencies, such as the quantification of safety and the definition of aggregation operators which enable the safety assessment of the entire process based on the safety values of its parts. The Safety-conscious process design approach was tested in one industrial design case. The results were promising, even without proper tools for knowledge handling and safety assessment.",
    keywords = "safety, safety engineering, design, design methodology, analyzing, evaluation, safety-consciousness, accidents, models, chemical industry",
    author = "Raija Koivisto",
    note = "Project code: VAL2419 Project code: VAL4409",
    year = "1996",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "951-38-4922-8",
    series = "VTT Publications",
    publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
    number = "264",
    address = "Finland",
    school = "University of Oulu",

    }

    Koivisto, R 1996, 'Safety-conscious process design: Dissertation', Doctor Degree, University of Oulu, Espoo.

    Safety-conscious process design : Dissertation. / Koivisto, Raija.

    Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1996. 156 p.

    Research output: ThesisDissertationCollection of Articles

    TY - THES

    T1 - Safety-conscious process design

    T2 - Dissertation

    AU - Koivisto, Raija

    N1 - Project code: VAL2419 Project code: VAL4409

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - Safety is one of the most important features of modern chemical processes. The foundation for the safety of a process is formed when designing the process. It is common practice to analyse the process with regard to safety during or at least at the end of the design. Accident and incident data together with other experiences, however, suggest that a considerable portion of process accidents and incidents are ultimately due to inadequate design. Based on the literature, this study strives first to identify the deficiencies and problems in current process design practice. Three common practices to address safety have been studied: adherence to good practice, safety analyses and inherently safer design. The problems in their use include the deficient coverage of the problem area and the analytic (not synthesizing) way to consider safety which often is too late because the important safety-related decisions have been made already. With regard to inherently safer design, there are no good tools available. To sum up, safety is not being taken continuously and systematically into consideration during process design. This study suggests a new process design approach, Safety-conscious process design methodology, which strives to raise the designer's safety-consciousness of the process to a level surpassing that of the current descriptive-analytical approach (i.e. safety is the result of the design decisions and can be analysed), the outcome being a prescriptive-synthetical approach (awareness of what the process safety should be after some design decision). Safety-conscious process design methodology is built on Phenomenon-driven process design methodology and Performance-driven design strategy. Safety has been defined in the same object hierarchy as 'process', thus including safety in the description of process and process design (in object form). This association makes safety considerations systematic and continuous during the process design. A new concept, safety balance, was developed to aid the safety assessment during the process design. Safety balance also offers a means of assessing the safety-consciousness of a design decision. The novel advantage of safety balance (when compared to current practices) is that balance control volume must be defined, i.e. the area or extent included in the safety consideration must be defined and this has not been self evident previously. Safety-conscious process design methodology still suffers from some deficiencies, such as the quantification of safety and the definition of aggregation operators which enable the safety assessment of the entire process based on the safety values of its parts. The Safety-conscious process design approach was tested in one industrial design case. The results were promising, even without proper tools for knowledge handling and safety assessment.

    AB - Safety is one of the most important features of modern chemical processes. The foundation for the safety of a process is formed when designing the process. It is common practice to analyse the process with regard to safety during or at least at the end of the design. Accident and incident data together with other experiences, however, suggest that a considerable portion of process accidents and incidents are ultimately due to inadequate design. Based on the literature, this study strives first to identify the deficiencies and problems in current process design practice. Three common practices to address safety have been studied: adherence to good practice, safety analyses and inherently safer design. The problems in their use include the deficient coverage of the problem area and the analytic (not synthesizing) way to consider safety which often is too late because the important safety-related decisions have been made already. With regard to inherently safer design, there are no good tools available. To sum up, safety is not being taken continuously and systematically into consideration during process design. This study suggests a new process design approach, Safety-conscious process design methodology, which strives to raise the designer's safety-consciousness of the process to a level surpassing that of the current descriptive-analytical approach (i.e. safety is the result of the design decisions and can be analysed), the outcome being a prescriptive-synthetical approach (awareness of what the process safety should be after some design decision). Safety-conscious process design methodology is built on Phenomenon-driven process design methodology and Performance-driven design strategy. Safety has been defined in the same object hierarchy as 'process', thus including safety in the description of process and process design (in object form). This association makes safety considerations systematic and continuous during the process design. A new concept, safety balance, was developed to aid the safety assessment during the process design. Safety balance also offers a means of assessing the safety-consciousness of a design decision. The novel advantage of safety balance (when compared to current practices) is that balance control volume must be defined, i.e. the area or extent included in the safety consideration must be defined and this has not been self evident previously. Safety-conscious process design methodology still suffers from some deficiencies, such as the quantification of safety and the definition of aggregation operators which enable the safety assessment of the entire process based on the safety values of its parts. The Safety-conscious process design approach was tested in one industrial design case. The results were promising, even without proper tools for knowledge handling and safety assessment.

    KW - safety

    KW - safety engineering

    KW - design

    KW - design methodology

    KW - analyzing

    KW - evaluation

    KW - safety-consciousness

    KW - accidents

    KW - models

    KW - chemical industry

    M3 - Dissertation

    SN - 951-38-4922-8

    T3 - VTT Publications

    PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    CY - Espoo

    ER -

    Koivisto R. Safety-conscious process design: Dissertation. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1996. 156 p.