Safety functions of automated mobile work machines

Timo Malm, Marita Hietikko, Risto Tiusanen, Ari Ronkainen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientific

Abstract

In the near future workers, manually driven mobile work machines and automated mobile machines may be working at the same time in large worksites. It is difficult to arrange adequate safety for workers while the production interruptions need to be minimised. This paper presents an idea of a toolbox, which helps the designer to create a safety system by applying suitable safety functions dynamically according to the existing risk. Typical safety functions are presented including stopping functions, reduced speed, movement towards safe direction, restricted area and dynamically changing safety distance. The user can invent other safety functions too, but then also the corresponding safety requirements need to be determined. The main goal is to keep the distance between persons and moving mobile work machines all the time longer than the stopping distance.
Another aspect is how the safety system can apply uncertain information received from sensors. Current sensors, which have adequate detection range, are not reliable enough and therefore additional measures are required to compensate the uncertainty of information. Several sensors and methods for detecting the position of a person are needed and all uncertainty or disparity in information increase the safety distance between a person and the machine. Complete stopping of the machine is tried to be avoided even under malfunction of the system. For example manual limping mode offers limited performance, but it is adequate to drive the machine out of a dangerous place.
When there is both manual and automated driving in the production site, it is essential to consider the responsibility of each party. Basically, automation is responsible for safety in automated drive and humans in manual drive. However, automation has always the major responsibility when it is applied. The automation and the safety system may be considered to be responsible for accidents caused by malfunction of machines or even foreseeable human mistakes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems
Subtitle of host publicationSIAS 2012
Place of PublicationMontreal
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2012
MoE publication typeB3 Non-refereed article in conference proceedings
Event7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems, SIAS 2012 - Montreal, Canada
Duration: 11 Oct 201212 Oct 2012

Conference

Conference7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems, SIAS 2012
Abbreviated titleSIAS 2012
CountryCanada
CityMontreal
Period11/10/1212/10/12

Fingerprint

Security systems
Automation
Sensors
Accidents
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Safety function
  • mobile work machine

Cite this

Malm, T., Hietikko, M., Tiusanen, R., & Ronkainen, A. (2012). Safety functions of automated mobile work machines. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems: SIAS 2012 Montreal.
Malm, Timo ; Hietikko, Marita ; Tiusanen, Risto ; Ronkainen, Ari. / Safety functions of automated mobile work machines. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems: SIAS 2012. Montreal, 2012.
@inproceedings{270df6ea720748d8b2f8143fa114f274,
title = "Safety functions of automated mobile work machines",
abstract = "In the near future workers, manually driven mobile work machines and automated mobile machines may be working at the same time in large worksites. It is difficult to arrange adequate safety for workers while the production interruptions need to be minimised. This paper presents an idea of a toolbox, which helps the designer to create a safety system by applying suitable safety functions dynamically according to the existing risk. Typical safety functions are presented including stopping functions, reduced speed, movement towards safe direction, restricted area and dynamically changing safety distance. The user can invent other safety functions too, but then also the corresponding safety requirements need to be determined. The main goal is to keep the distance between persons and moving mobile work machines all the time longer than the stopping distance.Another aspect is how the safety system can apply uncertain information received from sensors. Current sensors, which have adequate detection range, are not reliable enough and therefore additional measures are required to compensate the uncertainty of information. Several sensors and methods for detecting the position of a person are needed and all uncertainty or disparity in information increase the safety distance between a person and the machine. Complete stopping of the machine is tried to be avoided even under malfunction of the system. For example manual limping mode offers limited performance, but it is adequate to drive the machine out of a dangerous place.When there is both manual and automated driving in the production site, it is essential to consider the responsibility of each party. Basically, automation is responsible for safety in automated drive and humans in manual drive. However, automation has always the major responsibility when it is applied. The automation and the safety system may be considered to be responsible for accidents caused by malfunction of machines or even foreseeable human mistakes.",
keywords = "Safety function, mobile work machine",
author = "Timo Malm and Marita Hietikko and Risto Tiusanen and Ari Ronkainen",
note = "Project code: 71112-1.7.3",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-2-89631-635-9",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems",

}

Malm, T, Hietikko, M, Tiusanen, R & Ronkainen, A 2012, Safety functions of automated mobile work machines. in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems: SIAS 2012. Montreal, 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems, SIAS 2012, Montreal, Canada, 11/10/12.

Safety functions of automated mobile work machines. / Malm, Timo; Hietikko, Marita; Tiusanen, Risto; Ronkainen, Ari.

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems: SIAS 2012. Montreal, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientific

TY - GEN

T1 - Safety functions of automated mobile work machines

AU - Malm, Timo

AU - Hietikko, Marita

AU - Tiusanen, Risto

AU - Ronkainen, Ari

N1 - Project code: 71112-1.7.3

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In the near future workers, manually driven mobile work machines and automated mobile machines may be working at the same time in large worksites. It is difficult to arrange adequate safety for workers while the production interruptions need to be minimised. This paper presents an idea of a toolbox, which helps the designer to create a safety system by applying suitable safety functions dynamically according to the existing risk. Typical safety functions are presented including stopping functions, reduced speed, movement towards safe direction, restricted area and dynamically changing safety distance. The user can invent other safety functions too, but then also the corresponding safety requirements need to be determined. The main goal is to keep the distance between persons and moving mobile work machines all the time longer than the stopping distance.Another aspect is how the safety system can apply uncertain information received from sensors. Current sensors, which have adequate detection range, are not reliable enough and therefore additional measures are required to compensate the uncertainty of information. Several sensors and methods for detecting the position of a person are needed and all uncertainty or disparity in information increase the safety distance between a person and the machine. Complete stopping of the machine is tried to be avoided even under malfunction of the system. For example manual limping mode offers limited performance, but it is adequate to drive the machine out of a dangerous place.When there is both manual and automated driving in the production site, it is essential to consider the responsibility of each party. Basically, automation is responsible for safety in automated drive and humans in manual drive. However, automation has always the major responsibility when it is applied. The automation and the safety system may be considered to be responsible for accidents caused by malfunction of machines or even foreseeable human mistakes.

AB - In the near future workers, manually driven mobile work machines and automated mobile machines may be working at the same time in large worksites. It is difficult to arrange adequate safety for workers while the production interruptions need to be minimised. This paper presents an idea of a toolbox, which helps the designer to create a safety system by applying suitable safety functions dynamically according to the existing risk. Typical safety functions are presented including stopping functions, reduced speed, movement towards safe direction, restricted area and dynamically changing safety distance. The user can invent other safety functions too, but then also the corresponding safety requirements need to be determined. The main goal is to keep the distance between persons and moving mobile work machines all the time longer than the stopping distance.Another aspect is how the safety system can apply uncertain information received from sensors. Current sensors, which have adequate detection range, are not reliable enough and therefore additional measures are required to compensate the uncertainty of information. Several sensors and methods for detecting the position of a person are needed and all uncertainty or disparity in information increase the safety distance between a person and the machine. Complete stopping of the machine is tried to be avoided even under malfunction of the system. For example manual limping mode offers limited performance, but it is adequate to drive the machine out of a dangerous place.When there is both manual and automated driving in the production site, it is essential to consider the responsibility of each party. Basically, automation is responsible for safety in automated drive and humans in manual drive. However, automation has always the major responsibility when it is applied. The automation and the safety system may be considered to be responsible for accidents caused by malfunction of machines or even foreseeable human mistakes.

KW - Safety function

KW - mobile work machine

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-2-89631-635-9

BT - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems

CY - Montreal

ER -

Malm T, Hietikko M, Tiusanen R, Ronkainen A. Safety functions of automated mobile work machines. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Safety of Industrial Automated Systems: SIAS 2012. Montreal. 2012