Safety validation of complex components: Validation by analysis

Timo Malm, Maarit Kivipuro

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    Abstract

    The aim of the safety validation process is to prove that the product meets the safety requirements. Safety validation of complex programmable systems has become an increasingly common procedure since programmable systems have turned out to be useful also in safety related systems. However, a new kind of thinking related to the whole life cycle of the programmable product is needed and new validation methods (analysis and testing) to support the old methods are inevitable. This means that methods such as failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) are still applicable, but they are not sufficient. Methods are needed also to guarantee the quality of the hardware and software. The main validation methods are analysis and tests, and usually both are needed to complete the validation process. Analysis is very effective tool to validate simple systems thoroughly, but a complete analysis can be ineffective against failures of modern programmable electronics. Large programmable systems can be so complicated that a certain strategy in the validation process is necessary to keep the resources required reasonable. A good strategy is to start as early as possible and at the top level (system level). It is then possible to determine the safety critical parts by considering the safety requirements, categories (according to EN 954), safety integrity levels (according to IEC 61508), and the structure of the system. The critical parts are typically parts that the system rely on and which have some properties which cannot be seen clearly at the top level. A newly arising problem is that large programmable systems are becoming difficult to realise and the analysis is often difficult to understand. Figures can often illustrate the results of the analysis better than huge tables. However, there is no all-purpose excellent illustrating method, but the analyser needs to draw figures so that the main subject is well brought out.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationEspoo
    PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
    Number of pages52
    ISBN (Electronic)951-38-5658-5
    ISBN (Print)951-38-5657-7
    Publication statusPublished - 2000
    MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

    Publication series

    SeriesVTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes
    Number2022
    ISSN1235-0605

    Fingerprint

    Failure modes
    Life cycle
    Electronic equipment
    Hardware
    Testing

    Keywords

    • safety validation
    • complex components
    • failure mode
    • effect analysis
    • FMEA

    Cite this

    Malm, T., & Kivipuro, M. (2000). Safety validation of complex components: Validation by analysis. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes, No. 2022
    Malm, Timo ; Kivipuro, Maarit. / Safety validation of complex components : Validation by analysis. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2000. 52 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 2022).
    @book{7e325f42b84c4f74bba1b3e79a142fc5,
    title = "Safety validation of complex components: Validation by analysis",
    abstract = "The aim of the safety validation process is to prove that the product meets the safety requirements. Safety validation of complex programmable systems has become an increasingly common procedure since programmable systems have turned out to be useful also in safety related systems. However, a new kind of thinking related to the whole life cycle of the programmable product is needed and new validation methods (analysis and testing) to support the old methods are inevitable. This means that methods such as failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) are still applicable, but they are not sufficient. Methods are needed also to guarantee the quality of the hardware and software. The main validation methods are analysis and tests, and usually both are needed to complete the validation process. Analysis is very effective tool to validate simple systems thoroughly, but a complete analysis can be ineffective against failures of modern programmable electronics. Large programmable systems can be so complicated that a certain strategy in the validation process is necessary to keep the resources required reasonable. A good strategy is to start as early as possible and at the top level (system level). It is then possible to determine the safety critical parts by considering the safety requirements, categories (according to EN 954), safety integrity levels (according to IEC 61508), and the structure of the system. The critical parts are typically parts that the system rely on and which have some properties which cannot be seen clearly at the top level. A newly arising problem is that large programmable systems are becoming difficult to realise and the analysis is often difficult to understand. Figures can often illustrate the results of the analysis better than huge tables. However, there is no all-purpose excellent illustrating method, but the analyser needs to draw figures so that the main subject is well brought out.",
    keywords = "safety validation, complex components, failure mode, effect analysis, FMEA",
    author = "Timo Malm and Maarit Kivipuro",
    note = "Project code: S8SU00001",
    year = "2000",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "951-38-5657-7",
    series = "VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes",
    publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
    number = "2022",
    address = "Finland",

    }

    Malm, T & Kivipuro, M 2000, Safety validation of complex components: Validation by analysis. VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes, no. 2022, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

    Safety validation of complex components : Validation by analysis. / Malm, Timo; Kivipuro, Maarit.

    Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2000. 52 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 2022).

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Safety validation of complex components

    T2 - Validation by analysis

    AU - Malm, Timo

    AU - Kivipuro, Maarit

    N1 - Project code: S8SU00001

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - The aim of the safety validation process is to prove that the product meets the safety requirements. Safety validation of complex programmable systems has become an increasingly common procedure since programmable systems have turned out to be useful also in safety related systems. However, a new kind of thinking related to the whole life cycle of the programmable product is needed and new validation methods (analysis and testing) to support the old methods are inevitable. This means that methods such as failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) are still applicable, but they are not sufficient. Methods are needed also to guarantee the quality of the hardware and software. The main validation methods are analysis and tests, and usually both are needed to complete the validation process. Analysis is very effective tool to validate simple systems thoroughly, but a complete analysis can be ineffective against failures of modern programmable electronics. Large programmable systems can be so complicated that a certain strategy in the validation process is necessary to keep the resources required reasonable. A good strategy is to start as early as possible and at the top level (system level). It is then possible to determine the safety critical parts by considering the safety requirements, categories (according to EN 954), safety integrity levels (according to IEC 61508), and the structure of the system. The critical parts are typically parts that the system rely on and which have some properties which cannot be seen clearly at the top level. A newly arising problem is that large programmable systems are becoming difficult to realise and the analysis is often difficult to understand. Figures can often illustrate the results of the analysis better than huge tables. However, there is no all-purpose excellent illustrating method, but the analyser needs to draw figures so that the main subject is well brought out.

    AB - The aim of the safety validation process is to prove that the product meets the safety requirements. Safety validation of complex programmable systems has become an increasingly common procedure since programmable systems have turned out to be useful also in safety related systems. However, a new kind of thinking related to the whole life cycle of the programmable product is needed and new validation methods (analysis and testing) to support the old methods are inevitable. This means that methods such as failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) are still applicable, but they are not sufficient. Methods are needed also to guarantee the quality of the hardware and software. The main validation methods are analysis and tests, and usually both are needed to complete the validation process. Analysis is very effective tool to validate simple systems thoroughly, but a complete analysis can be ineffective against failures of modern programmable electronics. Large programmable systems can be so complicated that a certain strategy in the validation process is necessary to keep the resources required reasonable. A good strategy is to start as early as possible and at the top level (system level). It is then possible to determine the safety critical parts by considering the safety requirements, categories (according to EN 954), safety integrity levels (according to IEC 61508), and the structure of the system. The critical parts are typically parts that the system rely on and which have some properties which cannot be seen clearly at the top level. A newly arising problem is that large programmable systems are becoming difficult to realise and the analysis is often difficult to understand. Figures can often illustrate the results of the analysis better than huge tables. However, there is no all-purpose excellent illustrating method, but the analyser needs to draw figures so that the main subject is well brought out.

    KW - safety validation

    KW - complex components

    KW - failure mode

    KW - effect analysis

    KW - FMEA

    M3 - Report

    SN - 951-38-5657-7

    T3 - VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes

    BT - Safety validation of complex components

    PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    CY - Espoo

    ER -

    Malm T, Kivipuro M. Safety validation of complex components: Validation by analysis. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2000. 52 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 2022).