Sensitivity assessment of microgrid investment options to guarantee reliability of power supply in rural networks as an alternative to underground cabling

Sanna Uski, Kim Forssén (Corresponding Author), Jari Shemeikka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2831
JournalEnergies
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2018
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Microgrid
Distribution System
Alternatives
Outages
Costs
Cost Sharing
Operator
Electric power distribution
Energy storage
Sensitivity analysis
Electricity
Resiliency
Energy Storage
Regulatory Networks
Distribution Network
Storage System
Economics
Weather
Battery
Sensitivity Analysis

Keywords

  • Battery energy storage system (BESS)
  • Electricity distribution
  • Investment
  • Islanded operation
  • Micro combined heat and power (micro-CHP)
  • Microgrid
  • Network outage
  • Resilience
  • Solar photovoltaics (PV)
  • Underground cabling

Cite this

@article{14ad98d7d61149b89061b8cce243bb7c,
title = "Sensitivity assessment of microgrid investment options to guarantee reliability of power supply in rural networks as an alternative to underground cabling",
abstract = "Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.",
keywords = "Battery energy storage system (BESS), Electricity distribution, Investment, Islanded operation, Micro combined heat and power (micro-CHP), Microgrid, Network outage, Resilience, Solar photovoltaics (PV), Underground cabling",
author = "Sanna Uski and Kim Forss{\'e}n and Jari Shemeikka",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.3390/en11102831",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Energies",
issn = "1996-1073",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity assessment of microgrid investment options to guarantee reliability of power supply in rural networks as an alternative to underground cabling

AU - Uski, Sanna

AU - Forssén, Kim

AU - Shemeikka, Jari

PY - 2018/10/19

Y1 - 2018/10/19

N2 - Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.

AB - Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.

KW - Battery energy storage system (BESS)

KW - Electricity distribution

KW - Investment

KW - Islanded operation

KW - Micro combined heat and power (micro-CHP)

KW - Microgrid

KW - Network outage

KW - Resilience

KW - Solar photovoltaics (PV)

KW - Underground cabling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056221571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/en11102831

DO - 10.3390/en11102831

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Energies

JF - Energies

SN - 1996-1073

IS - 10

M1 - 2831

ER -