Sensitivity assessment of microgrid investment options to guarantee reliability of power supply in rural networks as an alternative to underground cabling

Sanna Uski, Kim Forssén (Corresponding Author), Jari Shemeikka

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number2831
    JournalEnergies
    Volume11
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2018
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Fingerprint

    Microgrid
    Distribution System
    Alternatives
    Outages
    Costs
    Cost Sharing
    Operator
    Electric power distribution
    Energy storage
    Sensitivity analysis
    Electricity
    Resiliency
    Energy Storage
    Regulatory Networks
    Distribution Network
    Storage System
    Economics
    Weather
    Battery
    Sensitivity Analysis

    Keywords

    • Battery energy storage system (BESS)
    • Electricity distribution
    • Investment
    • Islanded operation
    • Micro combined heat and power (micro-CHP)
    • Microgrid
    • Network outage
    • Resilience
    • Solar photovoltaics (PV)
    • Underground cabling

    Cite this

    @article{14ad98d7d61149b89061b8cce243bb7c,
    title = "Sensitivity assessment of microgrid investment options to guarantee reliability of power supply in rural networks as an alternative to underground cabling",
    abstract = "Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.",
    keywords = "Battery energy storage system (BESS), Electricity distribution, Investment, Islanded operation, Micro combined heat and power (micro-CHP), Microgrid, Network outage, Resilience, Solar photovoltaics (PV), Underground cabling",
    author = "Sanna Uski and Kim Forss{\'e}n and Jari Shemeikka",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    day = "19",
    doi = "10.3390/en11102831",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    journal = "Energies",
    issn = "1996-1073",
    publisher = "MDPI",
    number = "10",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Sensitivity assessment of microgrid investment options to guarantee reliability of power supply in rural networks as an alternative to underground cabling

    AU - Uski, Sanna

    AU - Forssén, Kim

    AU - Shemeikka, Jari

    PY - 2018/10/19

    Y1 - 2018/10/19

    N2 - Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.

    AB - Microgrids could be utilized to improve the distribution network resiliency against weather-related network outages and increase the security of power supply of rural electricity consumers. Whereas underground cabling is expensive for the distribution system operator (DSO), an alternative microgrid investment could benefit the DSO and consumer, provided the necessary changes were made in the network regulation. A rural detached house customer microgrid is analysed in comparison to underground cabling, considering the uncertainties in the calculation parameters through a sensitivity analysis. Adequacy of the microgrid power supply during unexpected network outage for a reasonably long duration is assessed, as well as the economics of the feasible microgrid setup consisting of variable generation, controllable generation, and electric storage. The total costs and benefits for the DSO and consumer/prosumer are considered. A microgrid would likely be a more cost-efficient option overall, but not as-is for the consumer. The battery energy storage system (BESS)-related cost-sharing strategies are suggested in this paper in order to assess possible break-even investment solutions for the related parties. The sensitivities of the microgrid and cabling investments were considered in particular. Cost-sharing strategies under network regulatory framework would need to be developed further in order for both the consumer and DSO to benefit from the solution as a whole.

    KW - Battery energy storage system (BESS)

    KW - Electricity distribution

    KW - Investment

    KW - Islanded operation

    KW - Micro combined heat and power (micro-CHP)

    KW - Microgrid

    KW - Network outage

    KW - Resilience

    KW - Solar photovoltaics (PV)

    KW - Underground cabling

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056221571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3390/en11102831

    DO - 10.3390/en11102831

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85056221571

    VL - 11

    JO - Energies

    JF - Energies

    SN - 1996-1073

    IS - 10

    M1 - 2831

    ER -