Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes

Tiina Tirkkonen, Kristina Saarela, Esko Kukkonen

Research output: Book/ReportReport

Abstract

It has been shown that odour is an important factor of material emissions and the odour of a product can very seldom be predicted by the chemical emissions. A full size chamber of 5 m³ equipped with a sniffing hood was built to enable both chemical measurements and sensory assessment to be performed using the test conditions of chemical testing. To compare the performance characteristics of the new 5-m³ chamber with the conventional chambers six different materials were tested both in 1-m³ chamber, sensory assessment chamber and in the 5-m³ chamber. The sensory assessment chamber used for the comparison was a 100-litre aluminium chamber, which was operated according to the principles given in Nordtest method NT Build 482 (diffusor). Statistical studies were performed to verify the panel size required for sensory tests for labelling purposes. Chemical and sensory test results obtained with different chambers were in good agreement. Comparing the results with the Finnish building material classification the chamber size would not have affected the labelling decision the materials. Statistical calculations presented here show that for labelling purposes reliable sensory acceptability evaluations can be performed using a relative small naive, untrained panel. When accepting uncertainty of 0.4 on the acceptability scale and a symmetric risk of 10 %, a panel of 5 members can be used. In those cases when the mean acceptability is near the labelling limit value, a bigger panel with 15 members is needed to ensure uncertainty of 0.2 acceptability units and 10 % risk level of making a wrong decision.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages58
ISBN (Electronic)951-38-6499-5
ISBN (Print)951-38-6498-7
Publication statusPublished - 2004
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Publication series

SeriesVTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes
Number2262
ISSN1235-0605

Fingerprint

odor
aluminum
labelling
evaluation method
chemical
test
material
decision
calculation
testing of chemicals
product
evaluation
comparison
limit value
method

Keywords

  • indoor air quality
  • emission chamber
  • sensory evaluation
  • building materials
  • labelling systems
  • chemical emissions
  • emission measurement
  • low emitting products

Cite this

Tirkkonen, T., Saarela, K., & Kukkonen, E. (2004). Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes, No. 2262
Tirkkonen, Tiina ; Saarela, Kristina ; Kukkonen, Esko. / Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2004. 58 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 2262).
@book{60bbdca0080e47b0b8a4e5002eb415c4,
title = "Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes",
abstract = "It has been shown that odour is an important factor of material emissions and the odour of a product can very seldom be predicted by the chemical emissions. A full size chamber of 5 m³ equipped with a sniffing hood was built to enable both chemical measurements and sensory assessment to be performed using the test conditions of chemical testing. To compare the performance characteristics of the new 5-m³ chamber with the conventional chambers six different materials were tested both in 1-m³ chamber, sensory assessment chamber and in the 5-m³ chamber. The sensory assessment chamber used for the comparison was a 100-litre aluminium chamber, which was operated according to the principles given in Nordtest method NT Build 482 (diffusor). Statistical studies were performed to verify the panel size required for sensory tests for labelling purposes. Chemical and sensory test results obtained with different chambers were in good agreement. Comparing the results with the Finnish building material classification the chamber size would not have affected the labelling decision the materials. Statistical calculations presented here show that for labelling purposes reliable sensory acceptability evaluations can be performed using a relative small naive, untrained panel. When accepting uncertainty of 0.4 on the acceptability scale and a symmetric risk of 10 {\%}, a panel of 5 members can be used. In those cases when the mean acceptability is near the labelling limit value, a bigger panel with 15 members is needed to ensure uncertainty of 0.2 acceptability units and 10 {\%} risk level of making a wrong decision.",
keywords = "indoor air quality, emission chamber, sensory evaluation, building materials, labelling systems, chemical emissions, emission measurement, low emitting products",
author = "Tiina Tirkkonen and Kristina Saarela and Esko Kukkonen",
note = "Project code: R4SU00460",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
isbn = "951-38-6498-7",
series = "VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
number = "2262",
address = "Finland",

}

Tirkkonen, T, Saarela, K & Kukkonen, E 2004, Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes. VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes, no. 2262, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes. / Tirkkonen, Tiina; Saarela, Kristina; Kukkonen, Esko.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2004. 58 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 2262).

Research output: Book/ReportReport

TY - BOOK

T1 - Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes

AU - Tirkkonen, Tiina

AU - Saarela, Kristina

AU - Kukkonen, Esko

N1 - Project code: R4SU00460

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - It has been shown that odour is an important factor of material emissions and the odour of a product can very seldom be predicted by the chemical emissions. A full size chamber of 5 m³ equipped with a sniffing hood was built to enable both chemical measurements and sensory assessment to be performed using the test conditions of chemical testing. To compare the performance characteristics of the new 5-m³ chamber with the conventional chambers six different materials were tested both in 1-m³ chamber, sensory assessment chamber and in the 5-m³ chamber. The sensory assessment chamber used for the comparison was a 100-litre aluminium chamber, which was operated according to the principles given in Nordtest method NT Build 482 (diffusor). Statistical studies were performed to verify the panel size required for sensory tests for labelling purposes. Chemical and sensory test results obtained with different chambers were in good agreement. Comparing the results with the Finnish building material classification the chamber size would not have affected the labelling decision the materials. Statistical calculations presented here show that for labelling purposes reliable sensory acceptability evaluations can be performed using a relative small naive, untrained panel. When accepting uncertainty of 0.4 on the acceptability scale and a symmetric risk of 10 %, a panel of 5 members can be used. In those cases when the mean acceptability is near the labelling limit value, a bigger panel with 15 members is needed to ensure uncertainty of 0.2 acceptability units and 10 % risk level of making a wrong decision.

AB - It has been shown that odour is an important factor of material emissions and the odour of a product can very seldom be predicted by the chemical emissions. A full size chamber of 5 m³ equipped with a sniffing hood was built to enable both chemical measurements and sensory assessment to be performed using the test conditions of chemical testing. To compare the performance characteristics of the new 5-m³ chamber with the conventional chambers six different materials were tested both in 1-m³ chamber, sensory assessment chamber and in the 5-m³ chamber. The sensory assessment chamber used for the comparison was a 100-litre aluminium chamber, which was operated according to the principles given in Nordtest method NT Build 482 (diffusor). Statistical studies were performed to verify the panel size required for sensory tests for labelling purposes. Chemical and sensory test results obtained with different chambers were in good agreement. Comparing the results with the Finnish building material classification the chamber size would not have affected the labelling decision the materials. Statistical calculations presented here show that for labelling purposes reliable sensory acceptability evaluations can be performed using a relative small naive, untrained panel. When accepting uncertainty of 0.4 on the acceptability scale and a symmetric risk of 10 %, a panel of 5 members can be used. In those cases when the mean acceptability is near the labelling limit value, a bigger panel with 15 members is needed to ensure uncertainty of 0.2 acceptability units and 10 % risk level of making a wrong decision.

KW - indoor air quality

KW - emission chamber

KW - sensory evaluation

KW - building materials

KW - labelling systems

KW - chemical emissions

KW - emission measurement

KW - low emitting products

M3 - Report

SN - 951-38-6498-7

T3 - VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes

BT - Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Tirkkonen T, Saarela K, Kukkonen E. Sensory evaluation method of building materials for labelling purposes. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2004. 58 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 2262).