Service innovations breaking institutionalized rules of health care

Arto Wallin, Lars Fuglsang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Although the digital era has given rise to major transformations in many industries, health care has been remarkably resistant to radical innovations coming outside the field. The purpose of this paper is to explore and explain how new ventures aim to break institutional arrangements (i.e. regulations, normative rules, and cultural-cognitive beliefs) protecting the field by introducing digitally enabled service innovations into health care markets. Design/methodology/approach: The study is qualitative and interpretative in nature and utilizes case study as a research strategy. The paper is based on data that were collected through narrative interviews and document analysis from seven new ventures participating in a start-up accelerator program. Findings: Results indicate that service innovations that require a change in the institutional structures of the health care system are enacted through three highly iterative key processes: institutional sensemaking that creates an understanding of prevailing institutional arrangements and that constructs meaning for institutional change efforts, theorization of change through linguistic device, and modifications of institutions by building legitimacy and mobilizing external constituencies. Practical implications: The findings provide practical insights into how new ventures struggle, navigate, and negotiate on specific alternatives related to institutional change while pursuing the introduction of innovations to market. Originality/value: This research extends the institutional perspective on service innovation by zooming into micro-level processes of institutional change driven by new ventures. The study develops the theory of institutional entrepreneurship by highlighting cognitive processes of change, and suggests incorporating "institutional thinking" more tightly into the study and management of service innovation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)972-997
    Number of pages26
    JournalJournal of Service Management
    Volume28
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    health care
    innovation
    market
    services
    Service innovation
    New ventures
    Rule-breaking
    Healthcare
    Institutional change
    methodology
    industry
    Institutional arrangements

    Keywords

    • service innovation
    • health services
    • institutional change
    • sensemaking
    • institutional entrepreneurship
    • digitalization of health care

    Cite this

    @article{9eae8b69e20d41d8a4fd3774eb8e8353,
    title = "Service innovations breaking institutionalized rules of health care",
    abstract = "Purpose: Although the digital era has given rise to major transformations in many industries, health care has been remarkably resistant to radical innovations coming outside the field. The purpose of this paper is to explore and explain how new ventures aim to break institutional arrangements (i.e. regulations, normative rules, and cultural-cognitive beliefs) protecting the field by introducing digitally enabled service innovations into health care markets. Design/methodology/approach: The study is qualitative and interpretative in nature and utilizes case study as a research strategy. The paper is based on data that were collected through narrative interviews and document analysis from seven new ventures participating in a start-up accelerator program. Findings: Results indicate that service innovations that require a change in the institutional structures of the health care system are enacted through three highly iterative key processes: institutional sensemaking that creates an understanding of prevailing institutional arrangements and that constructs meaning for institutional change efforts, theorization of change through linguistic device, and modifications of institutions by building legitimacy and mobilizing external constituencies. Practical implications: The findings provide practical insights into how new ventures struggle, navigate, and negotiate on specific alternatives related to institutional change while pursuing the introduction of innovations to market. Originality/value: This research extends the institutional perspective on service innovation by zooming into micro-level processes of institutional change driven by new ventures. The study develops the theory of institutional entrepreneurship by highlighting cognitive processes of change, and suggests incorporating {"}institutional thinking{"} more tightly into the study and management of service innovation.",
    keywords = "service innovation, health services, institutional change, sensemaking, institutional entrepreneurship, digitalization of health care",
    author = "Arto Wallin and Lars Fuglsang",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1108/JOSM-04-2017-0090",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "972--997",
    journal = "Journal of Service Management",
    issn = "1757-5818",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "5",

    }

    Service innovations breaking institutionalized rules of health care. / Wallin, Arto; Fuglsang, Lars.

    In: Journal of Service Management, Vol. 28, No. 5, 01.01.2017, p. 972-997.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Service innovations breaking institutionalized rules of health care

    AU - Wallin, Arto

    AU - Fuglsang, Lars

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - Purpose: Although the digital era has given rise to major transformations in many industries, health care has been remarkably resistant to radical innovations coming outside the field. The purpose of this paper is to explore and explain how new ventures aim to break institutional arrangements (i.e. regulations, normative rules, and cultural-cognitive beliefs) protecting the field by introducing digitally enabled service innovations into health care markets. Design/methodology/approach: The study is qualitative and interpretative in nature and utilizes case study as a research strategy. The paper is based on data that were collected through narrative interviews and document analysis from seven new ventures participating in a start-up accelerator program. Findings: Results indicate that service innovations that require a change in the institutional structures of the health care system are enacted through three highly iterative key processes: institutional sensemaking that creates an understanding of prevailing institutional arrangements and that constructs meaning for institutional change efforts, theorization of change through linguistic device, and modifications of institutions by building legitimacy and mobilizing external constituencies. Practical implications: The findings provide practical insights into how new ventures struggle, navigate, and negotiate on specific alternatives related to institutional change while pursuing the introduction of innovations to market. Originality/value: This research extends the institutional perspective on service innovation by zooming into micro-level processes of institutional change driven by new ventures. The study develops the theory of institutional entrepreneurship by highlighting cognitive processes of change, and suggests incorporating "institutional thinking" more tightly into the study and management of service innovation.

    AB - Purpose: Although the digital era has given rise to major transformations in many industries, health care has been remarkably resistant to radical innovations coming outside the field. The purpose of this paper is to explore and explain how new ventures aim to break institutional arrangements (i.e. regulations, normative rules, and cultural-cognitive beliefs) protecting the field by introducing digitally enabled service innovations into health care markets. Design/methodology/approach: The study is qualitative and interpretative in nature and utilizes case study as a research strategy. The paper is based on data that were collected through narrative interviews and document analysis from seven new ventures participating in a start-up accelerator program. Findings: Results indicate that service innovations that require a change in the institutional structures of the health care system are enacted through three highly iterative key processes: institutional sensemaking that creates an understanding of prevailing institutional arrangements and that constructs meaning for institutional change efforts, theorization of change through linguistic device, and modifications of institutions by building legitimacy and mobilizing external constituencies. Practical implications: The findings provide practical insights into how new ventures struggle, navigate, and negotiate on specific alternatives related to institutional change while pursuing the introduction of innovations to market. Originality/value: This research extends the institutional perspective on service innovation by zooming into micro-level processes of institutional change driven by new ventures. The study develops the theory of institutional entrepreneurship by highlighting cognitive processes of change, and suggests incorporating "institutional thinking" more tightly into the study and management of service innovation.

    KW - service innovation

    KW - health services

    KW - institutional change

    KW - sensemaking

    KW - institutional entrepreneurship

    KW - digitalization of health care

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049158773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/JOSM-04-2017-0090

    DO - 10.1108/JOSM-04-2017-0090

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 972

    EP - 997

    JO - Journal of Service Management

    JF - Journal of Service Management

    SN - 1757-5818

    IS - 5

    ER -