Should it be automatic or manual: The occupant's perspective on the design of domestic control systems

Sami Karjalainen (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The level of automation is one of the central issues in designing control systems. Occupant attitudes towards different levels of automation in domestic control systems were studied using a qualitative interview method. The following systems were considered: (1) control of indoor thermal environment, (2) peak load management, and (3) own energy production. For each system, four solutions representing different levels of automation were created. The interviewees gave comments on the solutions and chose the alternatives they preferred. The results show that decisions on the level of automation should be made carefully, taking account of the special qualities of each system without neglecting the individual differences between users. Full automation is not suitable for systems that considerably affect indoor environmental comfort. The interviews revealed a large amount of mistrust towards automation. An important question is how to improve the level of trust between the occupants and automation, i.e. how to make the occupants trust the automation in cases where better results would be gained through the utilisation of automation. The following system characteristics may potentially improve the level of trust: (1) carefully chosen level of automation, (2) predictability, transparency and feedback, (3) simplicity and usability and (4) suitability for everyday life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-126
Number of pages7
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Automation
Control systems
Transparency
Feedback

Keywords

  • domestic automation
  • individual control
  • level of automation
  • manula control
  • peak load management
  • Own energy production
  • individual differences
  • qaulitative interview study
  • thermal comfort
  • trust in automation

Cite this

@article{4b2c22eb1b0842bb9bf6336988a769f6,
title = "Should it be automatic or manual: The occupant's perspective on the design of domestic control systems",
abstract = "The level of automation is one of the central issues in designing control systems. Occupant attitudes towards different levels of automation in domestic control systems were studied using a qualitative interview method. The following systems were considered: (1) control of indoor thermal environment, (2) peak load management, and (3) own energy production. For each system, four solutions representing different levels of automation were created. The interviewees gave comments on the solutions and chose the alternatives they preferred. The results show that decisions on the level of automation should be made carefully, taking account of the special qualities of each system without neglecting the individual differences between users. Full automation is not suitable for systems that considerably affect indoor environmental comfort. The interviews revealed a large amount of mistrust towards automation. An important question is how to improve the level of trust between the occupants and automation, i.e. how to make the occupants trust the automation in cases where better results would be gained through the utilisation of automation. The following system characteristics may potentially improve the level of trust: (1) carefully chosen level of automation, (2) predictability, transparency and feedback, (3) simplicity and usability and (4) suitability for everyday life.",
keywords = "domestic automation, individual control, level of automation, manula control, peak load management, Own energy production, individual differences, qaulitative interview study, thermal comfort, trust in automation",
author = "Sami Karjalainen",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.043",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "119--126",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Should it be automatic or manual : The occupant's perspective on the design of domestic control systems. / Karjalainen, Sami (Corresponding Author).

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 65, 2013, p. 119-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should it be automatic or manual

T2 - The occupant's perspective on the design of domestic control systems

AU - Karjalainen, Sami

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The level of automation is one of the central issues in designing control systems. Occupant attitudes towards different levels of automation in domestic control systems were studied using a qualitative interview method. The following systems were considered: (1) control of indoor thermal environment, (2) peak load management, and (3) own energy production. For each system, four solutions representing different levels of automation were created. The interviewees gave comments on the solutions and chose the alternatives they preferred. The results show that decisions on the level of automation should be made carefully, taking account of the special qualities of each system without neglecting the individual differences between users. Full automation is not suitable for systems that considerably affect indoor environmental comfort. The interviews revealed a large amount of mistrust towards automation. An important question is how to improve the level of trust between the occupants and automation, i.e. how to make the occupants trust the automation in cases where better results would be gained through the utilisation of automation. The following system characteristics may potentially improve the level of trust: (1) carefully chosen level of automation, (2) predictability, transparency and feedback, (3) simplicity and usability and (4) suitability for everyday life.

AB - The level of automation is one of the central issues in designing control systems. Occupant attitudes towards different levels of automation in domestic control systems were studied using a qualitative interview method. The following systems were considered: (1) control of indoor thermal environment, (2) peak load management, and (3) own energy production. For each system, four solutions representing different levels of automation were created. The interviewees gave comments on the solutions and chose the alternatives they preferred. The results show that decisions on the level of automation should be made carefully, taking account of the special qualities of each system without neglecting the individual differences between users. Full automation is not suitable for systems that considerably affect indoor environmental comfort. The interviews revealed a large amount of mistrust towards automation. An important question is how to improve the level of trust between the occupants and automation, i.e. how to make the occupants trust the automation in cases where better results would be gained through the utilisation of automation. The following system characteristics may potentially improve the level of trust: (1) carefully chosen level of automation, (2) predictability, transparency and feedback, (3) simplicity and usability and (4) suitability for everyday life.

KW - domestic automation

KW - individual control

KW - level of automation

KW - manula control

KW - peak load management

KW - Own energy production

KW - individual differences

KW - qaulitative interview study

KW - thermal comfort

KW - trust in automation

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.043

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.043

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 119

EP - 126

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

ER -