Abstract
In an ideal world, occupants have an understanding of how
building systems work and are motivated to use the
systems as they were designed to be. There is
considerable evidence, however, that occupants do not
understand the principles of how buildings function and
that they use the systems non-optimally. The purpose of
the paper is to quantify the effect of occupant behaviour
on energy consumption and show how it is affected by
design strategies. Numerical simulations of an office
were performed with the dynamic thermal simulation
software TRNSYS. Three types of behaviour ('careless',
'normal', and 'conscious') and two types of design
('ordinary' and 'robust') were considered. The results
show that the effect of occupant behaviour on energy
consumption is greatly diminished with robust design
solutions, solutions that make buildings less sensitive
to occupant behaviour. The careless user consumes 75-79 %
less energy if the robust design solutions are applied
rather than the ordinary design solutions. It is argued
that a realistic view of occupant behaviour is
advantageous in the creation of energy-efficient
buildings (that is, leaving less need to learn how
buildings work, to be motivated to save energy, or to
perform specific energy-saving actions). However, the
possibility of personal control should not be eliminated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1257-1270 |
Journal | Energy Efficiency |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- Behaviour change
- Building design
- Robust design
- Energy conservation
- Energy efficiency
- Control system
- Usability
- Personal control