Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 76-83 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Progress in Nuclear Energy |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
| Event | 3rd European Review Meeting on Severe Accident Research, ERMSAR 2008 - Nesseber, Bulgaria Duration: 1 Sep 2008 → … |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Benchmarking
- Codes
- MCCI
- Reactor gases
Cite this
}
Simulation of corium concrete interaction in 2D geometry. / Cranga, M. (Corresponding Author); Spindler, B.; Dufour, E.; Dimov, D.; Athken, K.; Foit, J.; Garcia-Martin, M.; Sevon, Tuomo; Schmidt, W.; Spengler, C.
In: Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2010, p. 76-83.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulation of corium concrete interaction in 2D geometry
AU - Cranga, M.
AU - Spindler, B.
AU - Dufour, E.
AU - Dimov, D.
AU - Athken, K.
AU - Foit, J.
AU - Garcia-Martin, M.
AU - Sevon, Tuomo
AU - Schmidt, W.
AU - Spengler, C.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Benchmarking work was recently performed for the issue of molten corium concrete interaction (MCCI). A synthesis is given here. It concerns first the 2D CCI-2 test with a homogeneous pool and a limestone concrete, which was used for a blind benchmark. Secondly, the COMET-L2 and COMET-L3 2D experiments in a stratified configuration were used as a post-test (L2) and a blind-test (L3) benchmark. More details are given here for the recent benchmark considering a matrix of four reactor cases, with both a homogeneous and a stratified configuration, and with both a limestone and a siliceous concrete. A short overview is given on the different models used in the codes, and the consistency between the benchmark actions on experiments and reactor situations is discussed. Finally, the major uncertainties concerning MCCI are also pointed out.
AB - Benchmarking work was recently performed for the issue of molten corium concrete interaction (MCCI). A synthesis is given here. It concerns first the 2D CCI-2 test with a homogeneous pool and a limestone concrete, which was used for a blind benchmark. Secondly, the COMET-L2 and COMET-L3 2D experiments in a stratified configuration were used as a post-test (L2) and a blind-test (L3) benchmark. More details are given here for the recent benchmark considering a matrix of four reactor cases, with both a homogeneous and a stratified configuration, and with both a limestone and a siliceous concrete. A short overview is given on the different models used in the codes, and the consistency between the benchmark actions on experiments and reactor situations is discussed. Finally, the major uncertainties concerning MCCI are also pointed out.
KW - Benchmarking
KW - Codes
KW - MCCI
KW - Reactor gases
U2 - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.09.016
DO - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.09.016
M3 - Article
VL - 52
SP - 76
EP - 83
JO - Progress in Nuclear Energy
JF - Progress in Nuclear Energy
SN - 0149-1970
IS - 1
ER -