Abstract
Fatigue limits need to be extrapolated from test
specimens to manufactured products. The relevant industry
standards provide a method for this by utilizing the
statistics of defects in the material. We show here that
the standard method involves an inappropriate definition.
Moreover, it relates to the characteristic size of the
largest defects, which is not associated with any unique
exceedance probability. We outline a more consistent
method which, by a quantile of the largest defects,
relates the sample size effect to the desired failure
probability. This method is applicable also to samples
smaller than the test specimen.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 68-71 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing |
Volume | 594 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- fatigue
- gracture
- material defect
- microanalysis
- size effect
- steel