Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting

Maarit Tuomisaari

Research output: Book/ReportReport

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Ventilating a fire compartment during operational fire fighting procedures may have unpredictable consequences. In some cases the ventilation is advantageous: the hot gases are removed from the fire enclosure, the visibility improves and the enclosure cools down. In some cases the opposite happens: with the accelerated burning rate, more smoke is spread around, and the temperatures rise. The most dramatic consequence is the initiation of a backdraft, where the pyrolyzed gases ignite instantaneously, in the worst case causing a severe explosion. The effect of ventilating the fire compartment was studied systematically by quarter scale laboratory tests. The fire was initiated in a one-storey three-room compartment subject to different horizontal ventilation conditions. Both natural and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) were applied. The tests revealed many critical factors affecting the success of the attack. When properly used, PPV clearly improves the survival probability in the compartment: the visibility dramatically improves, and the temperatures are low everywhere outside the fire room. A fire spread zone model code (BRI2T) was applied to a few principal test scenarios. The model simulates well scenarios with no vigorous turbulent mixing of the gas layers, but predicting dependences between different parameters is tedious because the model (like all zone models) does not contain a feedback between varying ventilation conditions and the heat release rate. Due to these limitations, the available zone models are not suitable for PPV applications.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages54
ISBN (Electronic)951-38-5202-4
ISBN (Print)951-38-5201-6
Publication statusPublished - 1997
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Publication series

SeriesVTT Publications
Number326
ISSN1235-0621

Fingerprint

Smoke
Ventilation
Fires
Enclosures
Visibility
Gases
Explosions
Feedback
Temperature

Keywords

  • fires
  • fire fighting
  • smoke
  • ventilation
  • fire tests

Cite this

Tuomisaari, M. (1997). Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Publications, No. 326
Tuomisaari, Maarit. / Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1997. 54 p. (VTT Publications; No. 326).
@book{07d042a4f9ee4c91a703ce2503080796,
title = "Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting",
abstract = "Ventilating a fire compartment during operational fire fighting procedures may have unpredictable consequences. In some cases the ventilation is advantageous: the hot gases are removed from the fire enclosure, the visibility improves and the enclosure cools down. In some cases the opposite happens: with the accelerated burning rate, more smoke is spread around, and the temperatures rise. The most dramatic consequence is the initiation of a backdraft, where the pyrolyzed gases ignite instantaneously, in the worst case causing a severe explosion. The effect of ventilating the fire compartment was studied systematically by quarter scale laboratory tests. The fire was initiated in a one-storey three-room compartment subject to different horizontal ventilation conditions. Both natural and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) were applied. The tests revealed many critical factors affecting the success of the attack. When properly used, PPV clearly improves the survival probability in the compartment: the visibility dramatically improves, and the temperatures are low everywhere outside the fire room. A fire spread zone model code (BRI2T) was applied to a few principal test scenarios. The model simulates well scenarios with no vigorous turbulent mixing of the gas layers, but predicting dependences between different parameters is tedious because the model (like all zone models) does not contain a feedback between varying ventilation conditions and the heat release rate. Due to these limitations, the available zone models are not suitable for PPV applications.",
keywords = "fires, fire fighting, smoke, ventilation, fire tests",
author = "Maarit Tuomisaari",
note = "Project code: R6SU00692",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
isbn = "951-38-5201-6",
series = "VTT Publications",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
number = "326",
address = "Finland",

}

Tuomisaari, M 1997, Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting. VTT Publications, no. 326, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting. / Tuomisaari, Maarit.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1997. 54 p. (VTT Publications; No. 326).

Research output: Book/ReportReport

TY - BOOK

T1 - Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting

AU - Tuomisaari, Maarit

N1 - Project code: R6SU00692

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Ventilating a fire compartment during operational fire fighting procedures may have unpredictable consequences. In some cases the ventilation is advantageous: the hot gases are removed from the fire enclosure, the visibility improves and the enclosure cools down. In some cases the opposite happens: with the accelerated burning rate, more smoke is spread around, and the temperatures rise. The most dramatic consequence is the initiation of a backdraft, where the pyrolyzed gases ignite instantaneously, in the worst case causing a severe explosion. The effect of ventilating the fire compartment was studied systematically by quarter scale laboratory tests. The fire was initiated in a one-storey three-room compartment subject to different horizontal ventilation conditions. Both natural and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) were applied. The tests revealed many critical factors affecting the success of the attack. When properly used, PPV clearly improves the survival probability in the compartment: the visibility dramatically improves, and the temperatures are low everywhere outside the fire room. A fire spread zone model code (BRI2T) was applied to a few principal test scenarios. The model simulates well scenarios with no vigorous turbulent mixing of the gas layers, but predicting dependences between different parameters is tedious because the model (like all zone models) does not contain a feedback between varying ventilation conditions and the heat release rate. Due to these limitations, the available zone models are not suitable for PPV applications.

AB - Ventilating a fire compartment during operational fire fighting procedures may have unpredictable consequences. In some cases the ventilation is advantageous: the hot gases are removed from the fire enclosure, the visibility improves and the enclosure cools down. In some cases the opposite happens: with the accelerated burning rate, more smoke is spread around, and the temperatures rise. The most dramatic consequence is the initiation of a backdraft, where the pyrolyzed gases ignite instantaneously, in the worst case causing a severe explosion. The effect of ventilating the fire compartment was studied systematically by quarter scale laboratory tests. The fire was initiated in a one-storey three-room compartment subject to different horizontal ventilation conditions. Both natural and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) were applied. The tests revealed many critical factors affecting the success of the attack. When properly used, PPV clearly improves the survival probability in the compartment: the visibility dramatically improves, and the temperatures are low everywhere outside the fire room. A fire spread zone model code (BRI2T) was applied to a few principal test scenarios. The model simulates well scenarios with no vigorous turbulent mixing of the gas layers, but predicting dependences between different parameters is tedious because the model (like all zone models) does not contain a feedback between varying ventilation conditions and the heat release rate. Due to these limitations, the available zone models are not suitable for PPV applications.

KW - fires

KW - fire fighting

KW - smoke

KW - ventilation

KW - fire tests

M3 - Report

SN - 951-38-5201-6

T3 - VTT Publications

BT - Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Tuomisaari M. Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1997. 54 p. (VTT Publications; No. 326).