Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity

A recognition-theoretical approach

Arto Laitinen, Marketta Niemelä, Jari Pirhonen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Attitudes towards robots in elderly care are systematically sceptical: a central worry is that a robot caretaker will rob the elderly of their human contacts. Are such worries justified? Will robotics change something relevant concerning the human dignity of elders? Are some specific robots especially dubious, or can robotics, as a generic technology, change the practices of care so that human dignity would be under threat? In this paper, we ask what human dignity entails in elderly care, and what kinds of threats and possibilities social robotics may bring with it. Earlier studies have approached this question, for example, in light of the capability theories of human life, consistent with human dignity. Our starting point are theories of recognition of persons, which have distinguished three main kinds of needs for recognition: the need for respect as a person, the need to feel esteemed as a contributor to the common good, and the need to be loved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWhat Social Robots Can and Should Do
    PublisherIOS Press
    Pages155-163
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-61499-708-5
    ISBN (Print)978-1-61499-707-8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
    EventInternational Research Conference Robophilosophy 2016, TRANSOR 2016 - Aarhus, Denmark
    Duration: 17 Oct 201621 Oct 2016

    Publication series

    NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
    PublisherIOS Press
    VolumeVolume 290
    ISSN (Print)0922-6389
    ISSN (Electronic)1879-8314

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Research Conference Robophilosophy 2016, TRANSOR 2016
    Abbreviated titleTRANSOR 2016
    CountryDenmark
    CityAarhus
    Period17/10/1621/10/16

    Fingerprint

    human dignity
    robot
    threat
    common good
    human being
    respect
    contact

    Keywords

    • social robots
    • elderly care
    • human dignity
    • recognition theory

    Cite this

    Laitinen, A., Niemelä, M., & Pirhonen, J. (2016). Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity: A recognition-theoretical approach. In What Social Robots Can and Should Do (pp. 155-163). IOS Press. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol.. Volume 290 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-155
    Laitinen, Arto ; Niemelä, Marketta ; Pirhonen, Jari. / Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity : A recognition-theoretical approach. What Social Robots Can and Should Do. IOS Press, 2016. pp. 155-163 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. Volume 290).
    @inproceedings{83067df7d99a4cf1a28d3fd1fd9640e8,
    title = "Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity: A recognition-theoretical approach",
    abstract = "Attitudes towards robots in elderly care are systematically sceptical: a central worry is that a robot caretaker will rob the elderly of their human contacts. Are such worries justified? Will robotics change something relevant concerning the human dignity of elders? Are some specific robots especially dubious, or can robotics, as a generic technology, change the practices of care so that human dignity would be under threat? In this paper, we ask what human dignity entails in elderly care, and what kinds of threats and possibilities social robotics may bring with it. Earlier studies have approached this question, for example, in light of the capability theories of human life, consistent with human dignity. Our starting point are theories of recognition of persons, which have distinguished three main kinds of needs for recognition: the need for respect as a person, the need to feel esteemed as a contributor to the common good, and the need to be loved.",
    keywords = "social robots, elderly care, human dignity, recognition theory",
    author = "Arto Laitinen and Marketta Niemel{\"a} and Jari Pirhonen",
    note = "SDA: MIP: Design for Life",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-155",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-61499-707-8",
    series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",
    publisher = "IOS Press",
    pages = "155--163",
    booktitle = "What Social Robots Can and Should Do",
    address = "Netherlands",

    }

    Laitinen, A, Niemelä, M & Pirhonen, J 2016, Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity: A recognition-theoretical approach. in What Social Robots Can and Should Do. IOS Press, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. Volume 290, pp. 155-163, International Research Conference Robophilosophy 2016, TRANSOR 2016, Aarhus, Denmark, 17/10/16. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-155

    Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity : A recognition-theoretical approach. / Laitinen, Arto; Niemelä, Marketta; Pirhonen, Jari.

    What Social Robots Can and Should Do. IOS Press, 2016. p. 155-163 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. Volume 290).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity

    T2 - A recognition-theoretical approach

    AU - Laitinen, Arto

    AU - Niemelä, Marketta

    AU - Pirhonen, Jari

    N1 - SDA: MIP: Design for Life

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Attitudes towards robots in elderly care are systematically sceptical: a central worry is that a robot caretaker will rob the elderly of their human contacts. Are such worries justified? Will robotics change something relevant concerning the human dignity of elders? Are some specific robots especially dubious, or can robotics, as a generic technology, change the practices of care so that human dignity would be under threat? In this paper, we ask what human dignity entails in elderly care, and what kinds of threats and possibilities social robotics may bring with it. Earlier studies have approached this question, for example, in light of the capability theories of human life, consistent with human dignity. Our starting point are theories of recognition of persons, which have distinguished three main kinds of needs for recognition: the need for respect as a person, the need to feel esteemed as a contributor to the common good, and the need to be loved.

    AB - Attitudes towards robots in elderly care are systematically sceptical: a central worry is that a robot caretaker will rob the elderly of their human contacts. Are such worries justified? Will robotics change something relevant concerning the human dignity of elders? Are some specific robots especially dubious, or can robotics, as a generic technology, change the practices of care so that human dignity would be under threat? In this paper, we ask what human dignity entails in elderly care, and what kinds of threats and possibilities social robotics may bring with it. Earlier studies have approached this question, for example, in light of the capability theories of human life, consistent with human dignity. Our starting point are theories of recognition of persons, which have distinguished three main kinds of needs for recognition: the need for respect as a person, the need to feel esteemed as a contributor to the common good, and the need to be loved.

    KW - social robots

    KW - elderly care

    KW - human dignity

    KW - recognition theory

    U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-155

    DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-155

    M3 - Conference article in proceedings

    SN - 978-1-61499-707-8

    T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

    SP - 155

    EP - 163

    BT - What Social Robots Can and Should Do

    PB - IOS Press

    ER -

    Laitinen A, Niemelä M, Pirhonen J. Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity: A recognition-theoretical approach. In What Social Robots Can and Should Do. IOS Press. 2016. p. 155-163. (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. Volume 290). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-155